Muscatine

DNR to lose over one hundred jobs.

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Avatar
  • darylmaxen
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 982 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

This is good! " Geography?

"You're not good at geography either.   No streams from Illinois flow into other southern states except via the Mississippi."

 

You miss the whole point, DA! All the rivers in east-southern Illinois flow INTO the Ohio river. It then flows INTO the Mississippi. How many states have nitrogen flowing and combining INTO the Ohio river that dumps INTO the Miss.? Now...look at, let's say, the rivers in Missouri. How many states have their nitrogen flowing into Missouri rivers that eventually dump into the Miss? DA!

 

So, once again, brightboy...how can they track where it comes from and goes if there is no difference in elements of nitrogen? Who's is who's is who's?

 

BTW...I didn't do any math. I simply question your figures from YOUR non-DNR and non-EPA source.

 

And...why is it "safe" to say no other state exceeds Iowa production? That's just a guess. You furnished the source and the source never said that!

 

Geography lesson over!


Iowa must have some sort of "special" nitrogen.  Maybe there's a super-secret dye involved.  Or a radioactive marking agent.  Or unicorns track it from farmer Brown's field to the gulf. 

 

I believe they could believe all of those in Joeville.

Funny, Daryl! When the river was up, I went up and looked at Miss. Drive flooding, while I was on the way to buy some top-shelf 18 yr old bourbon. I actually saw a plume of Minnesota, and a plume of Wisconsin nitrogen floating by the river front. Later, I drove south of Muscatine and viewed the river from the levee.

 

It was then I realized that those two plumes had mixed with the plumes of nitrogen coming from GPC, AND, Muscatine's Waste Water Treatment Plant from their legally authorized discharges.

 

I now theorize that conspirators GPC and WW Tr Plant discharges have dyes added to make them look like farm field nitrogen so the farmers get blamed when they reach the Gulf.

 

It has to be so...I saw it with my own eyes! Unfortunately, based on malloboy's expert opinion, I have quit using nitrogen products on my lawn because I don't want it traced to my yard from the Gulf, and my formerly beautiful lawn is now suffering.

Deep cuts in narrow fields? Are you a farmer now, malboy? As with the source I furnished about Culver and his larger cuts from Oct, 2009; I went back and looked. You never made any such post back then about the even deeper cuts from him, mally. We can clearly see both your faces now!


Do I believe you went back and checked?   No.


I'm afraid I gottcha! on this one. Go back and repost to the post that you provided then, complaining about Culver's even more-massive cuts. It isn't there.....you can't! LMAO.

And another LMAO assertion from mally: "Iowa and Illinois generate 28% of the nitrogen reaching the gulf".

 

How would anyone know which nitrogen elements came from Iowa and Illinois, and in that type of quantity? That has to be nothing more than a guess from estimates.


There are people in the DNR and EPA who measure this.   That's how we know.   That's science, not opinion.


LMAO again! You don't believe in using the EPA or the DNR. You post here using whackball third party companies' information. YOU are the one that started this thread that way! Science? Hardly. None of their "science" can prove anything you have alleged related to Iowa and Illinois. The only scientific fact they can provide is that there is nitrogen in the Gulf. Did it come from the piss in Muscatine's WW Tr Plant; or fram lot runoff, or maybe the heavy hoards of deer herds we now hear about in the midwest?

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_2518034-hot-pizza.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow