Yea...the story changed to that quickly after I posted the rest of the story relating that only three full time people were being laid off. The rest were contract and part-timers that aren't really employees in the loss of jobs and benefits realm. But hey, that's just how liberals like to twist things.
You can try to twist this to suit yourelf but a job loss is a job loss regardless if it is a government or a contractor job. A hundred half time jobs lost are equivelent to fifty full time jobs lost.
But that's math again which you shun.
