Muscatine

You never provided anyone saying that!

Explain what this means.   Was I supposed to produce a body?

 Your source from the Iowa Policy Project does not state "the worst" or "worst conditions" anywhere in its report. In fact, after the 28% that is related, who is responsible for the other 72%, and how is it divided? Does not say, does it? Not a very balanced report, eh? Not very factual.

Here, mal-lie; I'll even make it easy for ya:

The article/proof I posted about Culver's massive layoff and budget cut announcement was on Oct 21, 2009. You joined this site on 07/22/09. The link below will take you to that period of October posts. Just click up a full page or two, and click down a full page or two around the Oct 21st dates of posts, and there you will see ZERO post threads started from yourself!

ZERO, NADA, NOTHING complaining about Culver's planned heavy layoffs and budget cuts! LMAO again! On your non-belief that I went back and checked....the proof is now at your fingertips and before your very eyes. I rest my case! The double standard shows its evil head again.

http://www.neighborhoodlink.com/Muscatine/topics?page=142

This is good! " Geography?

"You're not good at geography either.   No streams from Illinois flow into other southern states except via the Mississippi."

You miss the whole point, DA! All the rivers in east-southern Illinois flow INTO the Ohio river.

You posted "there are many streams in Iowa that flow into other southern states, then on south to the gulf. Same with Illinois."

The Ohio River is not a "Southern State".

 Again; how would anyone know who's nitrogen was wo's?It then flows INTO the Mississippi. How many states have nitrogen flowing and combining INTO the Ohio river that dumps INTO the Miss.? Now...look at, let's say, the rivers in Missouri. How many states have their nitrogen flowing into Missouri rivers that eventually dump into the Miss? DA!

The answer to your last question is ,I think, two.

So, once again, brightboy...how can they track where it comes from and goes if there is no difference in elements of nitrogen? Who's is who's is who's?

I've explained this more than once already.

BTW...I didn't do any math. I simply question your figures from YOUR non-DNR and non-EPA source.

I know, you don't do math.

And...why is it "safe" to say no other state exceeds Iowa production? That's just a guess. You furnished the source and the source never said that!

I don't think I said that either.

Geography lesson over!

Amen!