Muscatine

DNR to lose over one hundred jobs.

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

"You're just being silly.   The other 72% comes from the other 25 states and 3 Canadian provinces.  Who cares how it's divided.   None contribute more than Iowa or Illinois.   They average about 3% a piece.   Math again."

 

 

The jurisdictions and percents that you say are so.... do not show up in YOUR reports furnished earlier here....and that makes you quite the LIAR!

 


You need to look at the map and do some math.  There's no lie.

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Deep cuts in narrow fields? Are you a farmer now, malboy? As with the source I furnished about Culver and his larger cuts from Oct, 2009; I went back and looked. You never made any such post back then about the even deeper cuts from him, mally. We can clearly see both your faces now!


Do I believe you went back and checked?   No.


I'm afraid I gottcha! on this one. Go back and repost to the post that you provided then, complaining about Culver's even more-massive cuts. It isn't there.....you can't! LMAO.


Here, mal-lie; I'll even make it easy for ya:

The article/proof I posted about Culver's massive layoff and budget cut announcement was on Oct 21, 2009. You joined this site on 07/22/09. The link below will take you to that period of October posts. Just click up a full page or two, and click down a full page or two around the Oct 21st dates of posts, and there you will see ZERO post threads started from yourself!

ZERO, NADA, NOTHING complaining about Culver's planned heavy layoffs and budget cuts! LMAO again! On your non-belief that I went back and checked....the proof is now at your fingertips and before your very eyes. I rest my case! The double standard shows its evil head again.

 

http://www.neighborhoodlink.com/Muscatine/topics?page=142


Fine, I didn't say anything about Culver laying off workers.   Never said I did.   I just didn't believe anybody, including you, would be foolish to actually go back and check on it since it's irrelevant.   Reread what I said.


Thanks for confirming I "gottcha"! It is not irrelevant because you cry about Branstad laying off a FEW people...but say nothing in 2009, and make no post threads complaining then, as now proven, about Culver doing hundreds of layoffs and budget cuts! LMAO! He he he he he he! You even admit you find no posts from you about laying off workers! There were none from you! Conservatives had no issue with it! And you made no such complaint when compared to what you assert Branstad is now doing with "SEVERAL" layoffs, comparatively! LMAO!


You've missed the whole point again.   I'm pointing out the large number of  job terminations in a small segment of the state government which performs a vital service and is already underfunded and under staffed.  This when the economy is recovering and state revenues are likely to be adequate.

Branstad didn't do it.   Roger Lande did it. 

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

"You determine Iowa nitrogen by where it comes from.  If  it comes from Iowa it's Iowa nitrogen.   To make it even more clear for you, if it comes from Illinois it's Illinois nitrogen.  You don't wait for it to get to the gulf you measure it when it leaves the state.   It's a simple thing."

 

AHHHHHHHHH......now we are getting somewhere!

 

Just as I have posted time and time again....other states nitrogen flows into Iowa...as it does all other states in the Mississippi river drainage basin. When measuring Nitrogen LEAVING the state of Iowa, dingbat, it is already influenced by other states that flow into Iowa! The same with Illinois, dingbat! Have you checked how many rivers and streams flow into Iowa, dummy! Measure it when it leaves the state?????????

 

The simple answer to your question (dilemma) is you subtract what flows in from what flows out giving you the contribution from Iowa.  But subtraction is math again which you don't do well.   People normally learn subtraction early in school.   Right after counting and addition.   I don't know what grade you were supposed to learn that.   First?   Second?

I personally had the counting and some addition down before I even entered school.

 

 How about the nitrogen that flows INTO the state before it LEAVES the state, brightboy???? That is not Iowa's load!!!!! How many rivers flow into Iowa and then from Iowa into Missouri (none) and then flow elsewhere, including back over to the Miss.???? But then...nothing in your data says anything about how all this is measured. So, you are just posting your hypothetical, conspiratory, means of how nitrogen is measured, and where!  Where does your IPP report say they measured nitrogen leaving Iowa? It does not! It ONLY references Iowa's nitrogen being in the GULF! No way, Jose!

 

Unless , of course, you wish to back up the sources you have provided that have NOT provided this information before!!!!! Gottcha agin! Are you embarrassed yet?   You've gottch nothing.


You've retreated into your own little world of ;

excessive exclamation marks, 15

excessive question marks, 19

excessive name calling, 5

And even excessive H's, 9

 

I was going to give you a detailed description of how the nitrogen contributed from Iowa, could be determined.   But, you apparently would neither accept nor understand it.  It involves math.   Land area, stream cross sectional areas, river stages, stream velocity, parts per million (PPM), and statistics as well as addition and subtraction.

There's even chemistry but of course you knew that.

 

But I'm not.   I'll leave you with your belief that it can't be done.

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

 I was going to give you a detailed description of how the nitrogen contributed from Iowa, could be determined.   But, you apparently would neither accept nor understand it.  It involves math.   Land area, stream cross sectional areas, river stages, stream velocity, parts per million (PPM), and statistics as well as addition and subtraction.

There's even chemistry but of course you knew that.

 

But I'm not.   I'll leave you with your belief that it can't be done.


Sorry, I forgot extrapolation.

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_12477899-big-head.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow