This is directed to BS
I work in their industry.
If you truly work in the industry you don't pay a lot of attention to how it works or any other industry for that matter.
"That" refers to the insane assertion by you that Stanley would hire 20-30 civil engineers (AND support staff) for a project.
They would if the project was big enough. What's the maximum, you think it takes? Can't you envision a project that would be big enough to need 20 or 30? How many civil, structural, electrical, mechanical, instrumentation, chemical engineers and architects, drafters, secretaries, file clerks etc. did it take to design the last MPW power unit? I don't know either but I don't think 20 or 30 is out of line.
I forgot to include the sanitary engineers, surveyors, specification writers and the people who are on site during construction to see that it's built according to the plans and specifications.
I'm doubting more and more that you "work in their industry" I seem to know more about their industry than you and I make no claim to work in it.
If you "work in their industry" could it be as a truck driver, a backhoe operator, carpenter, electician, plumber or what?
You're again spouting the ravings of a L'imbaughcile. I know of no liberals who ever hated Max Stanley (or Richard either). He was revered by many. He was actually much more like one of us than one of you.
