G'morning Max, others,
There I go again getting into dutch for skipping a few details. I have to give you credit, at times you do give me something else to consider. I'll agree that when a, "just getting by" potential borrower sits before the loan officer and gets the skinny,.... they(assuming it's a couple) listen to the newly empowered lender's offerings, and they should have walked away. Not many did....nor seemed to realize (not just guessing here) that the attractive A.R.M. they were quoted would likely end up costing them everything. The lender did have a responsibility to point that out unless..........he didn't have the integrity to do so. Granted you, me, or some others........ we might know to give it more thought than some. But still, we are talking about 40% or less of the total foreclosures of those I spoke of. 60% or more were those defaulting upon major development mortgages. Millions upon millions at a time. Traders speculations only exacerbated it further. Then as I tried (poorly) to get across, if it hadn't been for the underhanded legislating and mindless passage of these bills/acts, it never would have happened in the first place. It was exactly why our finance system was modified 70 years ago. There are those who cannot see that far ahead, and would put their finances in jeopardy as easily. But if anyone disputes that we were better off eight years ago, then they were children then or a prisoner. Today,.... well as of this past July, the cost of energy has had a greater impact on LITERALLY EVERYsort of goods and services, not only here in America, but globally. 50% increases in most cases, than almost everything else over the last decade. So by that measure alone, what seemed do-able then isn't today. The mortgage system has been another victim of the out of control energy industry, also directly affected by the weakening of commodities and futures regulation the was established after the depression.(irrefutable)?
I must agree in Principal with you folks. I, as a potential borrower would give some serious thought before I signed "that" contract. Especially with all the uncertainty surrounding our economy, and manufacturing leaving the country to the tune of 10 MILLION since NAFTA(Clinton's signature) was passed. Although the NAFTA "Slick Willie" signed isn't the NAFTA of today. But I have to agree with Mr. Parot, "That giant sucking sound" WAS and still IS... "All our jobs going south of the border." But a president of today, should have known better that to just keep adding fuel to that fire by signing another five "free trade" corporate giveaways. These things are the irrefutable I speak of. The hyperbole I sometimes am guilty of, isn't within the real issues behind this mess. There are culprits hidden and in the open behind all this. You might be aware of an old saying, "There's a flea for every dog"? it's not just as easy as it looks. To simply say, those losing a home is their own fault. NOT all of them could see it coming, but I agree with you and others, there are some/ perhaps many of that 40% that could have. Even Gates got hit hard this past quarter.
I really wish we could get off the "Crude Trail" and get to financing a national push into Wind, Solar, Compressed Natural Gas, and electric cars again. Even the Diesel VW our daughter drove a few years ago, got over 50 MPG, But I understand up in this area that might be a tough sell in the winter.
Thank you for not poking fun at my name. It's why I go by Rose/Rosy (mother's first)I was happy not to have gotten my grandmother's (first), Mable.
God Bless



