Pickerington road project hits another curve
Let voters choose if they want to pay to widen Diley Road, council member says
Friday, February 11, 2005
Kirk D . Richards
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
A plan to widen a Pickerington road took another turn last night when a city councilman proposed a ballot issue that would put the project?’s fate ?— and perhaps its cost ?— in taxpayers?’ hands.
City Councilman Mitch O?’Brien said last night that he would seek to let voters decide how much Diley Road will be widened, a day after voting down a proposal from a political rival that would have put the issue on the May primary ballot.
O?’Brien, who made the new proposal last night at a Service Committee meeting, said the difference is his plan would require the public to pay more taxes if their preference is a three-lane project.
The council majority has decided that a five-lane project is best because most of the $13 million price would be covered by the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission and the Ohio Department of Transportation.
A three-lane project, which a number of Diley Road area residents would prefer, would require the city to cover the entire $10 million cost.
Wednesday night, Councilman Michael Sabatino?’s effort to place an advisory election on the ballot was defeated 4-3.
An advisory election essentially would have been a poll of residents?’ opinions on the issue.
O?’Brien said his proposal would be binding.
He said he would ask the county auditor?’s office what millage would be necessary to pay for a three-lane project over seven years.
O?’Brien said his proposal was in response to a perception that the council was not listening to residents?’ concerns.
''My personal opinion is that we have listened and acted appropriately,'' O?’Brien said.
Councilman Brian Wisniewski, part of the narrow majority that struck down Sabatino?’s proposal, said last night that he supported O?’Brien?’s proposal.
''If the residents want three lanes, it?’ll have to come out of their pockets,'' Wisniewski said. ''If this passes, then we?’ll re-engineer it for three lanes, but as far as I?’m concerned, this is a five-lane project.''
Councilman Doug Parker, who had supported Sabatino?’s proposal along with Councilman William Wright, questioned the timing of the new effort.
He said his colleagues should have mentioned the alternative proposal when they were considering Sabatino?’s.
''They didn?’t have the guts to say this to their faces when they had the residents right in front of them,'' Parker said. ''This is completely reactionary to save their political butts.''
krichards@dispatch.com
By Spending my money
Let voters choose if they want to pay to widen Diley Road, council member says
Friday, February 11, 2005
Kirk D . Richards
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
A plan to widen a Pickerington road took another turn last night when a city councilman proposed a ballot issue that would put the project?’s fate ?— and perhaps its cost ?— in taxpayers?’ hands.
City Councilman Mitch O?’Brien said last night that he would seek to let voters decide how much Diley Road will be widened, a day after voting down a proposal from a political rival that would have put the issue on the May primary ballot.
O?’Brien, who made the new proposal last night at a Service Committee meeting, said the difference is his plan would require the public to pay more taxes if their preference is a three-lane project.
The council majority has decided that a five-lane project is best because most of the $13 million price would be covered by the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission and the Ohio Department of Transportation.
A three-lane project, which a number of Diley Road area residents would prefer, would require the city to cover the entire $10 million cost.
Wednesday night, Councilman Michael Sabatino?’s effort to place an advisory election on the ballot was defeated 4-3.
An advisory election essentially would have been a poll of residents?’ opinions on the issue.
O?’Brien said his proposal would be binding.
He said he would ask the county auditor?’s office what millage would be necessary to pay for a three-lane project over seven years.
O?’Brien said his proposal was in response to a perception that the council was not listening to residents?’ concerns.
''My personal opinion is that we have listened and acted appropriately,'' O?’Brien said.
Councilman Brian Wisniewski, part of the narrow majority that struck down Sabatino?’s proposal, said last night that he supported O?’Brien?’s proposal.
''If the residents want three lanes, it?’ll have to come out of their pockets,'' Wisniewski said. ''If this passes, then we?’ll re-engineer it for three lanes, but as far as I?’m concerned, this is a five-lane project.''
Councilman Doug Parker, who had supported Sabatino?’s proposal along with Councilman William Wright, questioned the timing of the new effort.
He said his colleagues should have mentioned the alternative proposal when they were considering Sabatino?’s.
''They didn?’t have the guts to say this to their faces when they had the residents right in front of them,'' Parker said. ''This is completely reactionary to save their political butts.''
krichards@dispatch.com
By Spending my money



