Pickerington Area Taxpayers Alliance

papers 9

I shared some of my concerns with a civilian who had been remotely acquainted with the Luti-Feith-Perle political clan in his previous work for one of the senior Pentagon witnesses during the Iran-Contra hearings. He told me these guys were engaged in something worse than Iran-Contra. I was curious but he wouldn't tell me anything more. I figured he knew what he was talking about. I thought of him when I read much later about the 2002 and 2003 meetings between Michael Ledeen, Reuel Marc Gerecht and Iranian arms dealer Manucher Ghorbanifar -- all Iran-Contra figures.

In December 2002, I requested an acceleration of my retirement to the following July. By now, the military was anxiously waiting under the bed for the other shoe to drop amid concerns over troop availability, readiness for an ill-defined mission, and lack of day-after clarity. The neocons were anxiously struggling to get that damn shoe off. That other shoe fell with a thump, as did the regard many of us had held for Colin Powell, on Feb. 5 as the secretary of state capitulated to the neoconservative line in his speech at the United Nations -- a speech not only filled with falsehoods pushed by the neoconservatives but also containing many statements already debunked by intelligence.

War is generally crafted and pursued for political reasons, but the reasons given to the Congress and to the American people for this one were inaccurate and so misleading as to be false. Moreover, they were false by design. Certainly, the neoconservatives never bothered to sell the rest of the country on the real reasons for occupation of Iraq -- more bases from which to flex U.S. muscle with Syria and Iran, and better positioning for the inevitable fall of the regional ruling sheikdoms. Maintaining OPEC on a dollar track and not a euro and fulfilling a half-baked imperial vision also played a role. These more accurate reasons for invading and occupying could have been argued on their merits -- an angry and aggressive U.S. population might indeed have supported the war and occupation for those reasons. But Americans didn't get the chance for an honest debate.

President Bush has now appointed a commission to look at American intelligence capabilities and will report after the election. It will ''examine intelligence on weapons of mass destruction and related 21st century threats ... [and] compare what the Iraq Survey Group learns with the information we had prior...'' The commission, aside from being modeled on failed rubber stamp commissions of the past and consisting entirely of those selected by the executive branch, specifically excludes an examination of the role of the Office of Special Plans and other executive advisory bodies. If the president or vice president were seriously interested in ''getting the truth,'' they might consider asking for evidence on how intelligence was politicized, misused and manipulated, and whether information from the intelligence community was distorted in order to sway Congress and public opinion in a narrowly conceived neoconservative push for war. Bush says he wants the truth, but it is clear he is no more interested in it today than he was two years ago.

papers 10 whew!

Proving that the truth is indeed the first casualty in war, neoconservative member of the Defense Policy Board Richard Perle called this February for ''heads to roll.'' Perle, agenda setter par excellence, named George Tenet and Defense Intelligence Agency head Vice Adm. Lowell Jacoby as guilty of failing to properly inform the president on Iraq and WMD. No doubt, the intelligence community, susceptible to politicization and outdated paradigms, needs reform. The swiftness of the neoconservative casting of blame on the intelligence community and away from themselves should have been fully expected. Perhaps Perle and others sense the grave and growing danger of political storms unleashed by the exposure of neoconservative lies. Meanwhile, Ahmad Chalabi, extravagantly funded by the neocons in the Pentagon to the tune of millions to provide the disinformation, has boasted with remarkable frankness, ''We are heroes in error,'' and, ''What was said before is not important.''

Now we are told by our president and neoconservative mouthpieces that our sons and daughters, husbands and wives are in Iraq fighting for freedom, for liberty, for justice and American values. This cost is not borne by the children of Wolfowitz, Perle, Rumsfeld and Cheney. Bush's daughters do not pay this price. We are told that intelligence has failed America, and that President Bush is determined to get to the bottom of it. Yet not a single neoconservative appointee has lost his job, and no high official of principle in the administration has formally resigned because of this ill-planned and ill-conceived war and poorly implemented occupation of Iraq.

Will Americans hold U.S. policymakers accountable? Will we return to our roots as a republic, constrained and deliberate, respectful of others? My experience in the Pentagon leading up to the invasion and occupation of Iraq tells me, as Ben Franklin warned, we may have already failed. But if Americans at home are willing to fight -- tenaciously and courageously -- to preserve our republic, we might be able to keep it.


- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Karen Kwiatkowski now lives in western Virginia on a small farm with her family, teaches an American foreign policy class at James Madison University, and writes regularly for militaryweek.com on security and defense issues.

Soldiers for the Truth

http://www.sftt.org/

http://www.hackworth.com

By grunt

Get them before they get us

For those naive people that think Iraq has nothing to do with terrorism then think again. Saddam was paying families $25,000 to have their children carry suicide bombs into Israel buses and blow themselves up. Osama used the Palestine people as his reason for his war. If any of you think we can negotiate then we will lose our great country to fear.

So what that we make the Saddam's and Osoma's mad. We did nothing after the first World Trade Center attack in 1993. Clinton used the courts to punish the bombers. Did it work?

They blew up the Marine barracks in Lebanon during the Reagan term what did we do? We simply moved the troops off shore. Did it work?

Terrorist blew up the USS Cole what did Clinton do? I believe that killed about 17 sailors. We worked with the Yemen government for justice. Did it work?

How about the two embassies in Africa? Did we bring those people to justice? Did it work?

Osoma was very involved with the trap set on our US Rangers in Mogadishu in 1993. Remember that our dead solder's bodies were drug through the streets of Mogadishu? What did we do? We left the country. Did it work?

It is time that we take control of the world. We are the only super power and we must act. We must install democracies in this region of the world and rid these countries of these fanatics. If we walk away now we lose and they will do even more damage on our mainland. Let us not forget the men and women that died on September 11th, 2001. That attack was on our soil. It wasn't in Madrid in wasn't in south east Asia. It was on our soil. Remember also that the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania had turned around over Ohio.

That plane could have taken out one of our schools just as easily. We must not forget the brave souls that gave their lives to take that plane down before the terrorists could have killed more people.

We keep forgetting all the times before 9/11 because they were someplace else. We must place our military in their face and kill them before they kill us. Intellectuals beware because they will kill you as well. Lets not let our guard down now.


By Jar Head