Mitch O'Brien was sworn in last night as a Pickerington City Council man according to the Lancaster Eagle Gazette this morning. I understand the vote to appoint Mr. O'Brien was unanimous. That means Doug Parker stood on his principles once more and voted against himself after trying to bloody Mitch up a bit for not running for the office and being on a petition committee to oppose the purchase of Hickory Lakes.
If Mr. Parker really felt the way he did then why did he vote to appoint Mitch? Maybe there should be some kind of I Q test given council people and Doug should be the first in line for the test. I don't know about others but I am confused where does Doug stand? If he opposed Mitch then vote against him or abstain. That would have sent the message he was trying to send.
Now Doug looks wishy washy to me.
If Mr. Parker really felt the way he did then why did he vote to appoint Mitch? Maybe there should be some kind of I Q test given council people and Doug should be the first in line for the test. I don't know about others but I am confused where does Doug stand? If he opposed Mitch then vote against him or abstain. That would have sent the message he was trying to send.
Now Doug looks wishy washy to me.


