
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Ned, isn't it interesting how the liberals can't understand that if he's guilty of a crime, he should be prosecuted. If he's innocent, then he should be left alone. So simple, yet so beyond the intellectual capacity of the left.
Do you believe that the "guys in Guantanamo" are innocent? Is that what you're trying to tell us????? Let's go back and try this again. 1. Read the first paragraph above.
2. Read the second paragraph above.
3. Now try to answer the question. It should be easy. Just yes or no.
Add modifiers if you must.
I have made no comment on the guilt or innocence of those in Guantanamo. That's what the underlined part of paragraph one is for.
|
|
|
This is quite a query from such a small mind. Since those housed at Guantanamo are not U.S. citizens, and are indeed considered prisoners of war, do the same rights that we enjoy apply to them? And of course the broader question that you must ask yourself is if you believe that they are guilty or innocent. I, along with most rational humans, believe that they are guilty, and therefore have no such rights. They are being fed and housed, and should enjoy nothing else.
Now then, if they're guilty of a crime, should they be prosecuted? Well of course they should. Terroists deserve to die. If they're innocent, should they be released? Sure.
This is elementary for someone with my superior community college intellect. Next subject please.
Your Friend, Professor Joe |