I've noticed the problem with fonts and it seems to be a fairly recent glitch. Don't remember this happening in past years.
|
I've noticed the problem with fonts and it seems to be a fairly recent glitch. Don't remember this happening in past years. |
|
|
|
||
|
Mallory, I clearly stated that I thought ALL of the cheaters and liars should be gone, and that party affiliation doesn't matter.
But the big difference is that you aren't willing to name any conservatives. You just lump them into the category of "all cheaters and liars". This allows you to be opposed to corruption without admitting any of your favorite boys are involved in it. But with liberals, you use names, crimes, alleged crimes, mistakes, accusations and build them up to a constitutional crises and demand immediate resignation and hound them until they do.
Doesn't that cover all of them, or are you so blinded by your partisanship that the best you can do is attack the guy that brought Mr. Weiner's problems to the public's eye? Does it bother you that you can't say the same thing.....that lying and cheating Democrats and Republicans should be shown the door when they have been proven cheaters and liars? You just can't bring yourself to do it, can you?
I went beyond he should resign and said Weiner will resign and he did. No cheating, no crime, just lying.
|
|
|
I now believe the other posters who point out your inability to see or understand, and will politely not echo those who say you're simply stupid. I stated that anyone who cheats or lies does not deserve to serve in public office.....Republican or Democrat. Who does that not cover? Of course there are both involved. You can't seem to acknowledge that fact. You prefer to attack the guy who brought all of this to light. You prefer to say that this is not cheating (although I should think if it were your spouse that was involved, you think otherwise), no crime (ridiculous as we are now learning the ages of some of the girls involved and that others had these pictures sent to them without knowledge) and say that it's "just" lying. In my world, lying is a big deal. In yours, I suppose it's not. We knew he would resign, which for some reason you think is noble, but insisted he "should", because he's a bad guy, and bad guys shouldn't run the government.
Any of this sinking in? |
|
|
I now believe the other posters who point out your inability to see or understand, and will politely not echo those who say you're simply stupid.
Thank you for your politeness.
I stated that anyone who cheats or lies does not deserve to serve in public office.....Republican or Democrat. Who does that not cover?
Why do you contiune to ask that question? I've never said you're wrong. But I will now. It doesn't cover Independents, Libertarians, Socialists, or Green Party members among others.
Of course there are both (make that all) involved. You can't seem to acknowledge that fact.
I just did. Do I have to comment on all your writings or can I let some go some of the time?
You prefer to attack the guy who brought all of this to light.
I don't think I attacked him. I did mention his involvement in several dishonest and illegal activities. I'm still curious how he got involved.
You prefer to say that this is not cheating (although I should think if it were your spouse that was involved, you think otherwise),...
We can all define cheating as we like. Some wives would say having a copy of Playboy in the house was cheating.
... no crime (ridiculous as we are now learning the ages of some of the girls involved and that others had these pictures sent to them without knowledge)
As far as I know no inappropriate pictures were sent to underage girls.
and say that it's "just" lying. In my world, lying is a big deal. In yours, I suppose it's not.
Depends on the lie, how big of a deal it is. Could we just step back to the weapons of mass destruction for a minute?
...knew he would resign, which for some reason you think is noble,
Noble? Where does this come from? How would you know what I think?
... but insisted he "should", because he's a bad guy, and bad guys shouldn't run the government.
Any of this sinking in?
You're still being evasive. Should Vitter resign?
|