Muscatine

Can anyone follow this?   Who posted any diatribe about Stanleys (why the apostrophy?)?   I made a distinction between consusltant and lobbyist but BS seems to want to make it seem like I made them mean the same.

I'll take that title of expert.   If BS thinks I qualify, I'm sure I do.

Now can BS show us why we should believe he can "speak contractual law"? 

To msmal:

BB wrote : 4/26

... in 2009, his consulting firm was hired by Growth Energy and was paid a reported $312,500.00 for their consulting services.

Mallory wrote : 4/28

BS brings up "real facts" but he gives us only one out of five sentences that's even close to a "real fact" the one I didn't underline. In that one you have to substitute "lobbying" for "consulting" to get a factual statement.

justcurious wrote: 4/28

So don't say that Newt was lobbying when indeed his firm was paid for consulting . . . Lobbying and consulting are not interchangable . . .

Mallory wrote: 428

. . . I made a distinction between consultant and lobbyist but BS seemns to want to make it seem like I made them mean the same

So, tp/mallory, just exactly where did you make that distinction? I went thru every post/every word and you have never explained why one would substitute lobbying for consulting to make a factual statement. Please explain this to me.

I don't think Newt was paid the $300,000 for his consulting.   I think he was paid for his lobbying.   Therefore it's appropriate to make the substitution.

So you THINK Newt was paid for lobbying, not consulting and that is the distinction? I would appreciate a link to show where this info comes from - fact or fantasy.