Muscatine

 

The beam in the bonfire proves nothing.   It's what anybody would expect.   Nobody would expect steel to absorb sulfur unless the steel was molten.   That open fire wouldn't be nearly hot enough to melt steel.

 

 The experiment comes from fire investigator stating the sulfur that was found in the eutectic mixture came from gypsum board or molten aluminum. ....

....he want to prove to himself that it did not come from gypsum, diesel fuel, molten aluminum or office furniture! we're not talking about bending the steel we're talking about sulfadation. injection of sulfur into the steel,

 

And like I said it would have to be molten to absorb sulphur and the fire wasn't that hot.   Not even hot enough to weaken the steel much less melt it.  No sulphur in molten aluminum

 so explain how that happened to a piece of steel in wtc7. that's the point, even fema and nist can not explain it. the only way that happens is with thermite or thermate reaction with steel. the fires in those buildings were not either, explain EDNA CLINTON pictured standing in the plane hole prior to the collapse. how could that be if the steel was so hot it bent. C'mon the hole country was duped!

 the piece of steel is called eutectic steel. do the research as to where you find eutectic steel.

 

Eutectic or not, same answer. 

 

In all the Newton stuff, I saw nothing of impulse and momentum.  The scale readings were impossible to follow.

 

 once again you have to pay attention.these experiments were based on  laws of psychics. they are designed to show that when something is free falling it's weight is reduced,

 

But it has the same mass.   The equation is f = Ma.   M is for mass. ever heard of weightless training at nasa. ever see a news reporter that goes up in a plane to experience wieghtlessness. the plane flys upward real fast and then turns downward real fast and for a brief moment you experience weightlessness. if you watch the building it free falls for eight stories. the roof line is accelerating for eight floors. in order to do that it CAN NOT be smashing thru steel, concrete, furniture, glass and every other thing in a building. Even NIST admits the building did in fact attain free fall acceleration

 

basically you can not achieve free fall smashing through floors of concrete and steel and the weight of itself is not enough to smash through the whole building.

 

The weight of the top 10 to 20 floors was enough to smash through the rest.   One at a time. so you are saying that 10 or 20 floors were on fire and all the structures failed at the same time. that is the only way the roof line would FREE FALL in an even level motion, other wise the building would have leaned to one side because the steel structure would have resisted the crushing. do you understand the law of physics of action reaction. for EVERY ACTION there is an EQUAL and OPPOSITE reaction. if the top floors were smashing the bottom 10 or 20 floors there would NOT have been free fall. action reaction. that was the wedge test. the wedge with no resistance but his grip and fell from gravity. the other wedge needed force because of the wood it had to move and if you watch you see a slight slow of wedge atfer it hits the wood.

 

 Are they trying to make us believe sombody placed thermate inside some of the hollow rectangular columns and ignited it all at the instant the plane hit?   That's kinda what I got out of it.   Tell me if I'm wrong. I think it was just a suggestion,

 

 What does all the burning at the end supposed to mean? got me!

 

finally I close with this. My favorite reason not to believe in the 9/11 theory - that our government set up an elaborate scheme requiring hundreds of conspirators and sophisticated material to do it.   Not to mention the disappearance of hundreds of people. because it is like

god works in mysterious ways.

 

Don't try to blame it on God now. No it's LIKE saying god works in mysterious ways as a point in a debate. can't have happened because it would take too many people, that is your reason. too sophisticated, use a new cell phone or drive a new car or watch the mars landing. C'mon you people won't look at the evidence but you have an opinion. I don't trust CORPORATIONS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS or THE MEDIA they lie to achieve thier goals. 

 

 Well since you don't believe that a cabal of international elite have been conspiring to bring about one world government 

 

There are always those who want ever more domination.   You haven't connected them to this.OPERATION NORTHWOODS also refer to jfk and eisenhower videos

  

    It's kool all you think I'm a nut job but answer this one question,. "

  

 

I didn't find the one question. what if it is true and a shadow government was involved what would that mean!

 

 I watched one show from a rupert murdoch channel and your video is wrong. To me NGC would fall into the category of mainstream media or corporate media! 

 

I think you're right to worry about Murdoch taking over the NGC.   We will never be able to trust their programs on history and science again.  yet you use media from his channel and want me to believe it. corporate media is owed by the people who are pushing for one world government!

 

, not just that bin laden/muhjahideen was started by the CIA to fight russia in 79',

 

This was certainly a bad mistake, I agree.what you think it ended in the 80's C'mon plus the fact we sent aid to that region C'mon 1 plus 1 is 2 not 3 

 

 not jucausest that fact that we were sending aid to the taliban until may of 2001,

 

 

Again a mistake.Really is that how this country got this way just a bunch of idiots running things C'mon done by design these people are investors and business owners think they run there own stuff like they run the government. C'mon

 

not just that the architechs stated they designed the buildings to take hits from planes and they believed they had designed it to take multiple hits before collapsing.

 

If this is true, I doubt they designed for planes as large as those that hit it.tower design parameters

 

 

 

not just the fact the the sears tower got hit in the fifties and did not collapse

 

The Sears tower didn't exist in the fifties and has never been hit.

I think your thinking of the Empire State Building being hit in 1945.   It was a B-25 weighing 21,000 lbs. not a Boeing 757 or 767 weighing 300,000 plus lbs.yeah I alls mix those up. the building was NOT design to take hits nor was it built to the same spec. BECAUSE OF ITS CONFIGURATION, WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY THAT OF A STEEL BEAM 209' DEEP, THE TOWERS ARE ACTUALLY FAR LESS DARING STRUCTURALLY THAN A CONVENTIONAL BUILDING SUCH AS THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING WHERE THE SPINE OR BRACED AREA OF THE BUILDING IS FAR SMALLER IN RELATION TO ITS HEIGHT.

 

  I have a pile of videos and a few articles in this post it is only a drop in the bucket of all the info I could find on the subject. then you jump to the federal reserve, NAU, the amnesty they keep trying, the national ID, the bailouts and quantitative easing, s. 510, militarizing of the police and all the blatant abuses of the constitution.

 

I erased the bit about Cheney by mistake but he still has his Haliburton stock so he still is getting dividends if not more of what they call deferred pay hmmm and they received a majority of the contracts in both wars. coincidence or conflict of interest

 

And a plane did crash in PA.