9/11 experiments the great thermite debate this explanes newtons law of physics and how they apply to 9/11. a must watch please show proof this guy is wrong I double dog dare anyone to watch this video
|
9/11 experiments the great thermite debate this explanes newtons law of physics and how they apply to 9/11. a must watch please show proof this guy is wrong I double dog dare anyone to watch this video |
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
9/11 experiments the great thermite debate this explanes newtons law of physics and how they apply to 9/11. a must watch please show proof this guy is wrong I double dog dare anyone to watch this video
Some examples.
The beam in the bonfire proves nothing. It's what anybody would expect. Nobody would expect steel to absorb sulfur unless the steel was molten. That open fire wouldn't be nearly hot enough to melt steel. It would hardly reduce its strength.
In all the Newton stuff, I saw nothing of impulse and momentum. The scale readings were impossible to follow.
Are they trying to make us believe sombody placed thermate inside some of the hollow rectangular columns and ignited it all at the instant the plane hit? That's kinda what I got out of it. Tell me if I'm wrong.
What does all the burning at the end supposed to mean? |
|
|
Mabay, I watched the National Geographic channel today. They debunked everything you presented. Much better science, better pictures and far better logic.
Give up the idea that our government set up an elaborate scheme requiring hundreds of conspirators and sophisticated material to do it. Not to mention the disappearance of hundreds of people. The Saudis did it. If you still want to accuse our government, then accuse them of letting it happen. |