Always fascinating how you guys are so casual about corruption by Republicans involving millions of dollars, but will get upset if a Democrat uses two towels in the rest room to dry their hands.

What corruption?   Why don't I see this in any of the legitimate papers or news sources?  Why do I have to search for anything about this?  And then find it only on liberal web sites?  Why isn't it front page news in the mainstream liberal media?

Could it be because there is nothing to it?

My theory:  Dems realize that Kagan has to recuse herself from the Obamacare case because she helped the Obumbler push it through when she worked for him.  They want to "even up" the court by getting rid of Thomas.   They also do not cotton to a conservative black justice (just doesn't fit their mold).  In addition, a large % of obumbler's cabinet also made "errors" on their tax returns with immunity.  How 'bout that?

In the last post, I meant to type "impunity" instead of "immunity".

My use of the word "corruption" was meant to cover a broad range of misbehavior over a broad lengthy of time.   Not just Clarence.

He can be as black as he wants to be, but I wish he was a little more honest.

When the wife gets over a million dollars to lobby for something he will rule on, it seems like it might influence how he votes.   Might not like to turn down that tidy little source of income.