You're getting it
Dear Southern Parent,
First you say to take my concerns to the Board meeting on August 9th. Didn't we just have a mini scandal about the board meetings and voting on issues while the board was in a work session?
The second issue deals with those fraudulent boundary committee meetings. I went to one and left in disgust. They have tables set up for assigned people in the committee to then be controlled by a handler to get the decision needed by the board or superintendent or who ever. My neighbor faithfully attended all but the last meeting and she was exhausted by then. The fact is that the PLS board planned and put on a huge charade and in the end they ignored the parents and citizens of the district.
I have no hope that future projects like this will turn out any differently.
-By Anonymous
Dear Anon ?–
To clarify, we didn?’t just have a mini-scandal, we are in the midst of one. Two things to be sure of:
1. This ain?’t the first time this has happened. The last time it happened that meeting also included some of these board members.
2. Don?’t think the media is ready to give up on this story yet. They are now beginning to scratch the surface of something and I think they realize it.
The meeting you left in disgust ?– I was there and I was disgusted, too. I am glad you noticed how the groups were ?“salted?” with pro-levy, pro-school board boosters. Handlers is a great term. I wish that one had come to mind when I was there. I called them plenty of names but that would have worked much better. It wasn?’t just the school board who put on this boundary exhibition, if anyone wanted to do a little digging, contact the woman who was hired to facilitate the meetings. Her name is public record and she is local. She was ten times more frustrated that the regular joes like you and me. She was hired to take resident input and formulate recommendations to deliver. What she got was a boundary decision handed to her and given the mission to make sure the residents came to that inevitable conclusion.
Why would you believe for a minute that any future projects will be done differently? Quite simply put, they got away with it over and over again. They have never been called to task on it other than some complaining in this discussion forum. They will continue to have closed meetings and will continue to manipulate the taxpayers until everyone stands up and says ?“ENOUGH!!?”
By Drip / Hop
Dear Southern Parent,
First you say to take my concerns to the Board meeting on August 9th. Didn't we just have a mini scandal about the board meetings and voting on issues while the board was in a work session?
The second issue deals with those fraudulent boundary committee meetings. I went to one and left in disgust. They have tables set up for assigned people in the committee to then be controlled by a handler to get the decision needed by the board or superintendent or who ever. My neighbor faithfully attended all but the last meeting and she was exhausted by then. The fact is that the PLS board planned and put on a huge charade and in the end they ignored the parents and citizens of the district.
I have no hope that future projects like this will turn out any differently.
-By Anonymous
Dear Anon ?–
To clarify, we didn?’t just have a mini-scandal, we are in the midst of one. Two things to be sure of:
1. This ain?’t the first time this has happened. The last time it happened that meeting also included some of these board members.
2. Don?’t think the media is ready to give up on this story yet. They are now beginning to scratch the surface of something and I think they realize it.
The meeting you left in disgust ?– I was there and I was disgusted, too. I am glad you noticed how the groups were ?“salted?” with pro-levy, pro-school board boosters. Handlers is a great term. I wish that one had come to mind when I was there. I called them plenty of names but that would have worked much better. It wasn?’t just the school board who put on this boundary exhibition, if anyone wanted to do a little digging, contact the woman who was hired to facilitate the meetings. Her name is public record and she is local. She was ten times more frustrated that the regular joes like you and me. She was hired to take resident input and formulate recommendations to deliver. What she got was a boundary decision handed to her and given the mission to make sure the residents came to that inevitable conclusion.
Why would you believe for a minute that any future projects will be done differently? Quite simply put, they got away with it over and over again. They have never been called to task on it other than some complaining in this discussion forum. They will continue to have closed meetings and will continue to manipulate the taxpayers until everyone stands up and says ?“ENOUGH!!?”
By Drip / Hop


