I was reading the minutes from some of the council and committee meetings. I was shocked to see that there is a developer requesting an access road to 256 with a traffic light. I can?’t believe that council would entertain yet another light anywhere on 256 that didn?’t directly affect the health, welfare and financial interests of the taxpayers of this city. Not only was all this informaiton itself shocking, but the light being requested (demanded?) is between the Drug Mart and the light already at the Post Office! Can you imagine having a traffic light in that stretch to deal with??
I have to commend whoever directed that the lights be put on flash overnight. Even though some of them are now malfunctioning, the effort is appreciated. I often have to travel through town late at night and nothing is more frustrating than sitting through light after light with no other traffic around.
Speaking of the lights, does anyone out there know if there are any plans to improve the way the lights work? I mean it is plainly obvious that none of the lights are tied together to work together. I thought the intent of turning over the control of the lights near 70 was to allow ODOT to time them to work together. If they manage to get that part working, what benefit will it be to the rest of the area if none of the other lights work together or work with the ODOT lights? Will this make things worse than they are now?
I know it was the history of previous councils to approve all requests for access to 256 and in all but a fraction of the cases the city paid for the light. Will this council be different? Will this council have the guts to stand up to the developers and say you can have access, but on our terms?
I asked around a little about what might be proposed for the land to be serviced by this new road requested and I was told that a gas station and strip mall was proposed there! Do we need another gas station and strip mall especially in that stretch of 256? Aren?’t there plenty of vacant stores now in existing strip malls? If the current vacant stores can?’t be filled, why would we add more? Why don?’t we tear down the old ones? Why don?’t we tear down Drug Emporium plaza and replace it with something that can be filled or change the use to something different?
By Motorist
I have to commend whoever directed that the lights be put on flash overnight. Even though some of them are now malfunctioning, the effort is appreciated. I often have to travel through town late at night and nothing is more frustrating than sitting through light after light with no other traffic around.
Speaking of the lights, does anyone out there know if there are any plans to improve the way the lights work? I mean it is plainly obvious that none of the lights are tied together to work together. I thought the intent of turning over the control of the lights near 70 was to allow ODOT to time them to work together. If they manage to get that part working, what benefit will it be to the rest of the area if none of the other lights work together or work with the ODOT lights? Will this make things worse than they are now?
I know it was the history of previous councils to approve all requests for access to 256 and in all but a fraction of the cases the city paid for the light. Will this council be different? Will this council have the guts to stand up to the developers and say you can have access, but on our terms?
I asked around a little about what might be proposed for the land to be serviced by this new road requested and I was told that a gas station and strip mall was proposed there! Do we need another gas station and strip mall especially in that stretch of 256? Aren?’t there plenty of vacant stores now in existing strip malls? If the current vacant stores can?’t be filled, why would we add more? Why don?’t we tear down the old ones? Why don?’t we tear down Drug Emporium plaza and replace it with something that can be filled or change the use to something different?
By Motorist


