A politician is someone who continues to babble on for the sake of image and has zero integrity, concerns and ethics. They accomplish nothing. A statesman is someone with a vision for the future and has the ability to explain, negotiate, and compromise to get to the goal of the greater good.
With all this said, Councilman Brian Fox is a politician of negative integrity, zippo concerns (other than self), and completely lacking ethics.
Let me give you yet another example of Mr. Fox?’s own words to support this conclusion. 10/9/02 Pick Times-Sun ?– on the sleazy reconsideration of an old ordinance and re-pass the same by emergency - (ALL TO AVOID A REFERENDUM ON THE SUBJECT) ?–
Councilman Fox said he would not have supported the new ordinance because the city?’s citizens have the right to control what happens in Pickerington, even if they make the wrong decision.
Let?’s see sly fox, did you even second Shaver?’s motions to allow Initiatives and Charter changes to the tougher petition efforts?... that?’s a NO. Did you vote against any of these plats?.... that?’s another NO. Did you vote against any of those annexations ?– pre-determined zonings, tap fee inducements, or emergencies? that?’s three more No?’s.
Since everything on this Council passes by a 6-1 vote (except for the ?‘honorable?’ abstentions from those not wanting to get caught) and Fox isn?’t the 1. And where everything of merit used to pass by 7-0 before Shaver, your caught Mr. Fox. You?’ve voting history is the determinant of your stance. You are no Statesman and in the light of day a below average politician.
Maybe the wrong decision the city?’s citizens have made is to allow you to be in office.
By What best defines a politician?
With all this said, Councilman Brian Fox is a politician of negative integrity, zippo concerns (other than self), and completely lacking ethics.
Let me give you yet another example of Mr. Fox?’s own words to support this conclusion. 10/9/02 Pick Times-Sun ?– on the sleazy reconsideration of an old ordinance and re-pass the same by emergency - (ALL TO AVOID A REFERENDUM ON THE SUBJECT) ?–
Councilman Fox said he would not have supported the new ordinance because the city?’s citizens have the right to control what happens in Pickerington, even if they make the wrong decision.
Let?’s see sly fox, did you even second Shaver?’s motions to allow Initiatives and Charter changes to the tougher petition efforts?... that?’s a NO. Did you vote against any of these plats?.... that?’s another NO. Did you vote against any of those annexations ?– pre-determined zonings, tap fee inducements, or emergencies? that?’s three more No?’s.
Since everything on this Council passes by a 6-1 vote (except for the ?‘honorable?’ abstentions from those not wanting to get caught) and Fox isn?’t the 1. And where everything of merit used to pass by 7-0 before Shaver, your caught Mr. Fox. You?’ve voting history is the determinant of your stance. You are no Statesman and in the light of day a below average politician.
Maybe the wrong decision the city?’s citizens have made is to allow you to be in office.
By What best defines a politician?



