By the way, the thinking is that the only reason he would say something like he said, was to lay the groundwork for a rebuttle. It is important to his campaign. And the only reason he would feel he needs to get a jump on the rebuttle is he was "tipped off" and knows the SCOTUS vote went against him.
Now who on the Supreme Court do you think would be the one or ones who tip(s) him off (either directly or indirectly)?
Is there anyone there now who worked for him? Or who was instrumental in crafting the Obamacare concept? Or who is capable of ignoring the constitution and going with a personal agenda? Hmmmmmm.