|
|
Mr mallcontent defended this creep. It was "his opinion"; remember, davie?
BS,
Assuming you're using one of your usual derogatory terms for Mallory and then adding "Mr." and "his", and that you actually mean me, please point out where I defended him, Mr' Weiner
June 10 , 7:43 pm - you were certainly quite defensive - wondering how/why the pictures got out. It seemed you were more interested in why the pictures were out than the fact that the pictures, indeed, are out and he lied and said that his acct had been hacked and blah, blah, blah. You even inferred that it was a personal matter.
|
|
|
|
 - mallory
- Respected Neighbor
- USA
- 3461 Posts
-
|
Mr mallcontent defended this creep. It was "his opinion"; remember, davie?
BS,
Assuming you're using one of your usual derogatory terms for Mallory and then adding "Mr." and "his", and that you actually mean me, please point out where I defended him, Mr' Weiner
June 10 , 7:43 pm - you were certainly quite defensive - wondering how/why the pictures got out. It seemed you were more interested in why the pictures were out than the fact that the pictures, indeed, are out and he lied and said that his acct had been hacked and blah, blah, blah. You even inferred that it was a personal matter.
Are you doing the Work of BS now or did you use the wrong name?
I see nothing where I defend him. It is a personal matter for him and his wife. You (ether of you) nor anybody else never got back to me defining the "real problem" so I'll help you out, it's the distraction it's caused plus his constituents are getting very little of his attention.
My interest in the trail of the pictures is because Mr. Breitbart has been closely connected to dishonest and illegal activities before. The ACORN smear, Shirley's Sherodd's firing, the attempted set up and embarresment of a female reporter whose name I've forgotten, the phone tapping of Sen. Landreau. It just seems logical that since he was the source, that there could likely be something dishonest or illegal.
|
 - The Fox
- Respected Neighbor
- USA
- 856 Posts
-
|
Mr mallcontent defended this creep. It was "his opinion"; remember, davie?
BS,
Assuming you're using one of your usual derogatory terms for Mallory and then adding "Mr." and "his", and that you actually mean me, please point out where I defended him, Mr' Weiner
June 10 , 7:43 pm - you were certainly quite defensive - wondering how/why the pictures got out. It seemed you were more interested in why the pictures were out than the fact that the pictures, indeed, are out and he lied and said that his acct had been hacked and blah, blah, blah. You even inferred that it was a personal matter.
Are you doing the Work of BS now or did you use the wrong name?
I see nothing where I defend him. It is a personal matter for him and his wife. You (ether of you) nor anybody else never got back to me defining the "real problem" so I'll help you out, it's the distraction it's caused plus his constituents are getting very little of his attention.
My interest in the trail of the pictures is because Mr. Breitbart has been closely connected to dishonest and illegal activities before. The ACORN smear, Shirley's Sherodd's firing, the attempted set up and embarresment of a female reporter whose name I've forgotten, the phone tapping of Sen. Landreau. It just seems logical that since he was the source, that there could likely be something dishonest or illegal.
So, if I may be so bold as to summarize, we never saw the videos of the ACORN crooks, Shirley Sherrodd wasn't fired by the Democratic knothead Vilsack, there's a fairytale about an unnamed female reporter, and Weiner's weiner is not an issue?
You've been hanging with Mobay again, haven't you? You should never, ever use the term "logical".
|
|
|
Mr mallcontent defended this creep. It was "his opinion"; remember, davie?
BS,
Assuming you're using one of your usual derogatory terms for Mallory and then adding "Mr." and "his", and that you actually mean me, please point out where I defended him, Mr' Weiner
June 10 , 7:43 pm - you were certainly quite defensive - wondering how/why the pictures got out. It seemed you were more interested in why the pictures were out than the fact that the pictures, indeed, are out and he lied and said that his acct had been hacked and blah, blah, blah. You even inferred that it was a personal matter.
Are you doing the Work of BS now or did you use the wrong name?
I see nothing where I defend him. It is a personal matter for him and his wife. You (ether of you) nor anybody else never got back to me defining the "real problem" so I'll help you out, it's the distraction it's caused plus his constituents are getting very little of his attention.
My interest in the trail of the pictures is because Mr. Breitbart has been closely connected to dishonest and illegal activities before. The ACORN smear, Shirley's Sherodd's firing, the attempted set up and embarresment of a female reporter whose name I've forgotten, the phone tapping of Sen. Landreau. It just seems logical that since he was the source, that there could likely be something dishonest or illegal.
Sorry if I stepped on your toes BB - couldn't help myself. Thgis poster sometimes just p*sses me off and I need to offer my 2 cents.
msmal, I did get back to you concerning the REAL problem but you chose to ignor it. Go back and look. You are very good at shooting off your mouth and trying to blame someone when in this particular case the blame is on mr weiner and ONLY mr weiner. He took the pictures, he sent the pictures and then lied for 10 or so days saying that he had been hacked and hinting that the pictures maybe were not him and on and on and on. I don't give a rip how Brietbart got the pictures, I don't even care that mr weiner wants all the women to see his weiner but when a member of the United States Congress does that and then lies and lies and lies for days on end THAT is a problem to me. If you are man enough to show your manhood to females that you don't even know and that you are not married to then by gawd man up and admit it, and then get out of the Congress and avoid us any further shame.
|
