Reason; logic; common sense? People sure put alot into polls, huh? A college does random polling phone calls, has no clue who they are talking too, no idea of the truth of how old they are, or whether anything they say is true, with no way of knowing/verifying if they are registered voters, and then publish their results saying that those polled "identified with the tea party". Headline grabbing, heh?
When one reads the poll's "Nature of the Sample" (for the Registered Voters) tables, it says only 28% of these registered voters "support the the party" as a whole. So how does that math work in this publication? They don't state in the article that only 28% of the voters polled support the tea party. It is only found in the original survey report table. That means that the 70% (WOW) (from the article headline); of the 28% that support the tea party; out of the published 1084 people who are voters; is who this really is. A whopping 213 people. See how liars lie?
Who was using the word "minority" in this thread?
LMAO!
What was somebody saying the other day about DA's that don't look things up? Some should also try reading their garbage they post so it doesn't embarrass them like this.