Muscatine

dems, repubs destroying America

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

  "In the US, there is basically one party - the business party. It has two factions called the Democrats & Republicans, which are somewhat different but carry out variations of the same policies. By & large, I am opposed to those policies."

-Noam Chomsky

 

In the next century, nations as we know [them] will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all. – Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's deputy secretary of state, as quoted in Time, July 20, l992

 

It's easy to point fingers at our corrupt and run amuck government, and it surely has run amuck (AMUCK: In a murderous frenzy as if possessed by a demon; wildly; without self-control).  Recently, the honorable Congresswoman, Cynthia McKinney, stated that America is being run by a "criminal syndicate."  There is abundant concrete evidence that our own government officials orchestrated the attacks on 911.  Yet, the average American has their head up their hind end.  Sadly, this includes Christians.  I hear so many Christian people expressing the utmost loyalty to a Satanist, mass-murdering, lying, stealing, manipulating, unsaved President--George W. Bush.  It's a sign of America's apostate condition.  While brainwashed believers are defending their evil president, faithful members of congress such as Dr. Ron Paul, and congresswomen Cynthia McKinney and Maxine Waters are trying to wake the American people up!  Do you really think you're pleasing God by being so blindly loyal to authority, that you totally ignore the FACT that your own political leaders are crying out for your help in this battle against evil?  Read what Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) has said...

 

In 2002 I asked my House colleagues a rhetorical question with regard to the onslaught of government growth in the post-September 11th era: Is America becoming a police state?

The question is no longer rhetorical.  We are not yet living in a total police state, but it is fast approaching.  The seeds of future tyranny have been sown, and many of our basic protections against government have been undermined.  The atmosphere since 2001 has permitted Congress to create whole new departments and agencies that purport to make us safer- always at the expense of our liberty.  But security and liberty go hand-in-hand.  Members of Congress, like too many Americans, don’t understand that a society with no constraints on its government cannot be secure.  History proves that societies crumble when their governments become more powerful than the people and private institutions.

Unfortunately, the new intelligence bill passed by Congress two weeks ago moves us closer to an encroaching police state by imposing the precursor to a full-fledged national ID card.  Within two years, every American will need a “conforming” ID to deal with any federal agency-- including TSA at the airport. 

Undoubtedly many Americans and members of Congress don’t believe America is becoming a police state, which is reasonable enough.  They associate the phrase with highly visible symbols of authoritarianism like military patrols, martial law, and summary executions.  But we ought to be concerned that we have laid the foundation for tyranny by making the public more docile, more accustomed to government bullying, and more accepting of arbitrary authority- all in the name of security.  Our love for liberty above all has been so diminished that we tolerate intrusions into our privacy that would have been abhorred just a few years ago.  We tolerate inconveniences and infringements upon our liberties in a manner that reflects poorly on our great national character of rugged individualism.  American history, at least in part, is a history of people who don’t like being told what to do.  Yet we are increasingly empowering the federal government and its agents to run our lives.

Terror, fear, and crises like 9-11 are used to achieve complacency and obedience, especially when citizens are deluded into believing they are still a free people.  The loss of liberty, we are assured, will be minimal, short-lived, and necessary.  Many citizens believe that once the war on terror is over, restrictions on their liberties will be reversed.  But this war is undeclared and open-ended, with no precise enemy and no expressly stated final goal.  Terrorism will never be eradicated completely; does this mean future presidents will assert extraordinary war powers indefinitely?

Washington DC provides a vivid illustration of what our future might look like.  Visitors to Capitol Hill encounter police barricades, metal detectors, paramilitary officers carrying fully automatic rifles, police dogs, ID checks, and vehicle stops.  The people are totally disarmed; only the police and criminals have guns.  Surveillance cameras are everywhere, monitoring street activity, subway travel, parks, and federal buildings.  There's not much evidence of an open society in Washington, DC, yet most folks do not complain-- anything goes if it's for government-provided safety and security.

After all, proponents argue, the government is doing all this to catch the bad guys.  If you don’t have anything to hide, they ask, what are you so afraid of?  The answer is that I’m afraid of losing the last vestiges of privacy that a free society should hold dear.  I’m afraid of creating a society where the burden is on citizens to prove their innocence, rather than on government to prove wrongdoing.  Most of all, I’m afraid of living in a society where a subservient populace surrenders its liberties to an all-powerful government.

It may be true that average Americans do not feel intimidated by the encroachment of the police state.  Americans remain tolerant of what they see as mere nuisances because they have been deluded into believing total government supervision is necessary and helpful, and because they still enjoy a high level of material comfort.  That tolerance may wane, however, as our standard of living falls due to spiraling debt, endless deficit spending at home and abroad, a declining fiat dollar, inflation, higher interest rates, and failing entitlement programs.  At that point attitudes toward omnipotent government may change, but the trend toward authoritarianism will be difficult to reverse.

Those who believe a police state can't happen here are poor students of history.  Every government, democratic or not, is capable of tyranny.  We must understand this if we hope to remain a free people.

 

 

  America is being destroyed by enemies within and with the help of a corrupted Congress and dumbed down (through public education and the corporate media), apathetic, indifferent and lazy public. The window for action to reverse the fascist trend of the last 50 years is fast closing and only an awake and vigilant citizenry can begin to comprehend and take action against the coming totalitarian devastation we have allowed to manifest in our country.

Excessive youtube usage proved to cause brain lock.

 

Cut and pasting causes testicular shrinkage.

 

Snowballs cause cancer.

 

 

  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor
  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Gun
Owners of America









Republicans are Trying to Block the
“No Gun Registration”
Amendment!

Please call Minority
Leader McConnell
today






Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has been doing a yeoman’s job of trying to rein in
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and protecting the
privacy of gun owners.

 

But now, according to senate insiders, the Republican leadership is trying
to undermine these efforts by urging fellow Republicans to oppose Paul’s “no gun
registration” amendment.

 

Paul’s amendment would exempt gun records -- including 4473’s (the form all
purchasers fill out when they buy a firearm from a licensed dealer) -- from the
blanket information demands which the ATF can make under the 9/11
legislation.

 

We have known for weeks that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would oppose
Rand Paul. But now, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is also helping
“Dirty Harry” Reid by encouraging other Senate Republicans to oppose the Paul
language.

 

All gun owners need to take action right now. Time is short, as the PATRIOT
Act extension will become a done deal sometime tomorrow (Friday).

 

So please use the Talking Points below TO CALL Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell today! Ask him to support the Paul amendment and to urge other
Republicans to do the same.

 

Even if you live in Kentucky,
please make sure you call the Senator’s office, because time is short.

 

CONTACT INFORMATION for Mitch McConnell:

 

Direct office number: 202-224-2541

 

Toll-free switchboard number (you must ask for McConnell’s office):
1-877-762-8762

 

Email: The Senator does NOT accept emails from out of state

 

TALKING POINTS FOR SENATOR McCONNELL

 

1. Please urge Senator McConnell to support the Paul “no gun registration”
amendment and to use his leadership position to urge other Republicans to do the
same.

 

2. Without the Paul “no gun registration” amendment, it is possible that
the ATF could go to a secret (FISA) court and demand every 4473 in the country,
ostensibly because a “terrorism investigation” requires it. If such an action
were taken, the government would have a list of every gun buyer in the country
going back decades.

 

3. If Senator McConnell allows Harry Reid to successfully shut out gun
amendments, then gun owners will hold him (McConnell) personally responsible for
enabling the Majority Leader. And if the Democrats retain the control of the
Senate in 2012, the Republicans will only have themselves to blame.

 

4. ANSWERS TO POSSIBLE OBJECTION. Senators have been trying to tell
Senator Paul (and Senator McConnell will probably tell you) that the PATRIOT Act
does not allow the ATF to get every 4473 in the country. Well, there are two
answers to this:

 

a.      
First, if the PATRIOT Act does not, in fact, allow the ATF to go on
fishing expeditions, then what is the harm in passing the Paul amendment? Why
not just pass the Paul provision so that we can have an extra ounce of
prevention specifically prohibiting the ATF from using the PATRIOT Act to fish
for people’s gun sale records.

 

b.     
Second, the very language that some Senators are claiming will protect us
is the very language that the ATF is currently violating! Senators like
McConnell want us to think that the 1986 McClure-Volkmer law (which outlaws gun
owner registration) is good enough to protect us from fishing expeditions under
the PATRIOT Act.

 

But as any law school student and judge in the country knows, more recent
laws (like the PATRIOT Act) ALWAYS TRUMP older laws (like the 1986 Act which
prohibits gun owner registration). If there is a conflict, the more recent law
governs. Hence, it’s not surprising that we are currently witnessing the ATF
violate the 1986 McClure-Volkmer law, as the agency recently issued new proposed
rules to require registration of those persons who purchase multiple semi-autos
-- and all of this in the name of fighting gun smuggling in the
Southwest.
Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow