Our liberal judges who legislated the gay shit were asked by voters to leave the bench last November. More to go in 2012 when we vote on the others' retentions.
|
Our liberal judges who legislated the gay shit were asked by voters to leave the bench last November. More to go in 2012 when we vote on the others' retentions. |
|
|
|
||
|
The only thing, THE ONLY THING, I see positive about there being gays in the military is when there is a sudden call to war and they have to ship out quickly. The gays will be the first ones there because they already have their sh!t packed.
|
|
|
Wow SL.....did you ever hit that one right on the nose. He's going to keep calling folks bigots until he runs out of "thens" and "thans". I was hoping that after all these years of davie posting here, he would have finally learned when and how to use "an" and "a"; and "to" and "too" correctly. No dice. |
|
|
ISociety will be harmed by it, It detroys the family unit (mother, father and children)
Although it won't create a family of a mother father and children, it won't destroy one either. If two people of the same sex marry in Iowa, it won't effect my family relationships one bit. Even if they live next door.
I already know by your post that you don't agree with this point of view, so let me ask you a question. If marriage is accepted between same sex couples because it is their civil right, because after all they were "born this way" Where do you draw the line? Do you draw it at the point of polygamy? Incestual relationships? How about pedophiles? I'm betting the later would say they were born like that and did not choose it.
Why would you bring up pedophiles? That's just a cheap, stupid scare tactic
David Thorstad is a homosexual activist and historian of the gay Thorstad argues that there is a natural and undeniable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. He expresses bitterness that the gay rights movement has, in his view, abandoned pedophilia. Thorstad writes: "Boy-lovers were involved in the gay movement from the beginning, and their presence was tolerated. Gay youth groups encouraged adults to attend their dances. . . . There was a mood of tolerance, even joy at discovering the myriad of lifestyles within the gay and lesbian subculture."[50] The inaugural issue of the Gay Community News in 1979 published a "Statement to the Gay Liberation Movement on the Issue of Man/Boy Love," which challenged the movement to return to a vision of sexual liberation. It argued that "the ultimate goal of gay liberation is the achievement of sexual freedom for all--not just equal rights for 'lesbian and gay men,' but also freedom of sexual expression for young people and children." In the early years there was some reluctance to accept pedophilia, primarily among feminist and lesbian activist groups. In March 1979 the Lesbian Feminist Liberation (LFL) accusing "so-called Man/Boy Lovers" of "attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults. . . . Feminists easily recognize this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children." The coalition went on record as opposing "the sexual abuse of children by heterosexual or homosexual persons."[51] Despite this opposition, Thorstad claims that by 1985 homosexual pedophiles had won acceptance within the gay movement. He cites Jim Kepner, then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles: "A point I've been trying to make is that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we'd better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks, of Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be gay today."[52] In 1985 NAMBLA was admitted as a member in New York's council of Lesbian and Gay Organizations as well as the International Gay Association--now the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA). In the mid-1990's ILGA's association with NAMBLA and other pedophile groups cost the organization it's status as a Non- Governmental Organization in the United Nations.
Mallory you can find many articles such as this, now I am not saying that all homosexuals would be on board with this, actually I am guessing the majority would be opposed. That does not mean that no one would try to use it. |