big brother........back from cali huh?? saw you drumming @ the Moose last evening!!!!!!
|
big brother........back from cali huh?? saw you drumming @ the Moose last evening!!!!!! |
|
|
|
||
|
Sorry for your mis-read, its, but I backed no one in my post. In fact, if you were a little more astute, you might have realized my post was an interrogatory. (All those funny little things that look like this "?" means I asked questions. Something liberals here said it was ok to do a long time ago.) Having said that, davie's tacit admission just helps prove what the article related. Thanks, davie. (Even though you were not going to post directly about walmart anymore.) |
|
|
Sorry for your mis-read, its, but I backed no one in my post. In fact, if you were a little more astute, you might have realized my post was an interrogatory. (All those funny little things that look like this "?" means I asked questions. Something liberals here said it was ok to do a long time ago.) i didn't misread anything, bbro. maybe i did forgot that you are the Socrates of NL...an impartial, question-asking seeker of the truth. LLLMAO. your "?" marks are not interrogatory, they are only rhetorical... and in this case, they serve as the implied and biased answers to your own false, straw-man arguments. |
|
|
Ahhh...the fool retorts. They are as I wish them to be used and intended, my good man. Sorry for your mis-read, its, but I backed no one in my post. In fact, if you were a little more astute, you might have realized my post was an interrogatory. (All those funny little things that look like this "?" means I asked questions. Something liberals here said it was ok to do a long time ago.) i didn't misread anything, bbro. maybe i did forgot that you are the Socrates of NL...an impartial, question-asking seeker of the truth. LLLMAO. your "?" marks are not interrogatory, they are only rhetorical... and in this case, they serve as the implied and biased answers to your own false, straw-man arguments.
|