Muscatine

Mr. Logic - I did answer you. You find my words to insulting to read. Remember? I even replied that I was not going to reply. I've shown you respect.

Maybe you missed these words:

QUOTE:

Logic - I respectfully disagree with your view as I did the first time I read it. However I can not bring myself to provide you with a different point of view because that may be insulting to McCain. I'll just re-ask, how does being a "POW" qaulify a person for being President.

Ding, ding, ding....... Ring a bell.

There you go puttin' words in other's mouths again, davie. When did Mr. Powell say "my Republican President asked me to lie and embrassed not only me but my country. Now I support Democrats." You have that on record somewhere? How come you never asked for criminal charges against Powell back then, davie?

And if he DID lie before...he then has no credibility and his endorsement means squat! But it is so like you to apply double-standards to this...you do for everything else anyway, davie.

BB - It just keeps getting worse for you....

http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx

This may or may not be one of those other sites you never visit. LMAO

Dave we must have quite a different idea of an answer as you elude to.  What you posted was a reply, not an answer. 

Not once did I elude to your words being "to insulting to read".  Yes, I do feel your questions are for nothing other than to be offensive or insulting to McCain and I did answer this question, "how does being a "POW" qaulify (qualify) a person for being President."  You obviously do not like the answer which I may add your candidate does not have that qualification that I stated.

As I've stated before, I try to look at the candidate for President as any employer should.  What experience and quailifications do they have?  What accomplishments do they have to their credit?  Do they have anything in their past that is beneficial to our company?  Do they haveanything in their past that is detrimental?  The list that an employer should know goes on but you might get the idea here.  You see Dave, we are hiring a person for a job, the most important job in the world and if they cannot provide what I seek as their employer I am not interested.  If you would honestly look for the answers to these questions you may feel differently about your candidate.

Try to answer posts without so much emotion Dave, it makes you sound a bit silly and sometimes your point gets lost.  I would recommend doing as I do, re-read the post a couple of times if you feel you need to reply, then read it a bit more as you answer.  And then, of course, read what you have written in response.  Quite often that takes emotion out of it.