Even though I don't believe Bush will be impeached, I certainly agree with the statement above.

http://www.whistlestopper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=72201

Another new book on sale, huh, davie? Wonder why such honorable people wait until their "information" is packaged for sale before bringing to the public, or to Congress, of the FBI for that matter?

Of course, this is more hype over old information. Another author playing Dan Rather...oh yea...Dan Rather...I remember...lost his job over his faked letter.

I thought you just asserted that someone else on this board let sleeping dogs lie in another post!

I particularly like the paragraph on governance of the CIA and what the CIA cannot do....especially since that is what they do every single day.

Ron Suskind? Questionable, at best.

Nigel Inkster CMG

Director of Transnational Threats and Political Risk
 
Responsibilities: Analysis of international political risk and development of programmes on counter terrorism, international crime, proliferation of CBRN, cross-border conflict and other transnational/global issues.  Nigel is also responsible for the IISS Armed Conflict Database.
 
Background: Nigel Inkster served in the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) from 1975 to 2006.  He was posted in Asia, Latin America and Europe and worked extensively on transnational issues.  He spent seven years on the Board of SIS, the last two as Assistant Chief and Director for Operations and Intelligence.  He is a Chinese speaker and graduated in Oriental Studies from St John's College Oxford.  Inkster says:

"Mr Suskind appears to have conflated separate conversations; one about the problems of reading Saddam Hussein's intentions, an issue which is dealt with in the Butler report, and one about Habbush. I made it clear to Mr Suskind that I was in no position to comment on the substance or significance of any dealings with the latter since I had not been privy to the detail of what had taken place, something Mr Suskind has chosen not to mention. And, in any event, I had made it clear to Mr Suskind, when first he approached me, that I would not divulge classified information to which I had had access during my time in government.

"Mr Suskind's characterisation of our meeting is more the stuff of creative fiction than serious reportage, and seeks to make more of it than the circumstances or the content warrented. 
 

Don't you evrer get tired of being wrong? I never made any such claim.

Again wrong............ Show where I said anything about the source being Honorable?