Muscatine

And he was impeached for that - later acquitted - but MANY refuse to acknowledge that INDEED he was impeached.

Clinton was impeached because there was enough strong evidence against him. The "Bush lied" chant just isn't enough, no matter how many times it's repeated.

Not quite true.  We have clear evidence on Bush, but it is questionable whether he broke the law or not.  Lying to us isn't illegal, and he wasn't under oath with congress.  But, the IG has determined that Fieth use intel inappropriately by using discredited intel in the NIE, and the Sneate report clear documents misleading and outright false statements.

So, let me get this straight.  If one person lied, all lies are now OK?  SO, if someone murder someone before, I can now murder with impunity?  Are you serious? 

BTW, agre eor disagree with Clinton's actions, and I disagree with a lot of them, UN actions are within the scope of international law.  Our agreements, our law as the agreements were accepted by congress, says we can't invade accept under two conditions 1) within the UN and 2) in case of imminent threat.  Which one was true when we went into Iraq?