Muscatine

Stanley Hilton Lawsuit

Stanley G. Hilton has filed a class action lawsuit in Federal court in Northern California against against high officials in the current Bush administration (including the federal government, bush, Cheney, Rice, Mueller, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft), for complicity in aiding and abetting and facilitating the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks.

His suit contends, and we strongly concur, that the defendants did so in order to launch unconstitutional aggressive war against the sovereign states of Afghanistan and Iraq, declare political opponents "enemy combatants," suspend the Constitution indefinitely, etc., all for sordid political ends which subvert the very system of laws and Constitution the defendants have sworn to uphold in their offices.

The suit alleges that Bush, as President, violated the US Constitution by deliberately lying to - and defrauding - the US Congress into passing an "Enabling Act" resolution in October 2002, authorizing Bush to wage aggressive war on Iraq. The war is unconstitutional and an illegal drain on the US taxpayers' funds in the treasury. The suit alleges the Iraq war is unconstitutional and that declaratory and injunctive relief should be ordered. It is unconstitutional and illegal because the president violated the Separation of Powers provisions of the Constitution by deliberately lying to the Congress by falsely assuring them that Bush had evidence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, and that Iraq was involved in plotting and carrying out the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade center Twin Towers and the Pentagon Attack - attacks actually orchestrated by defendants. The suit also alleges that the USA Patriot Act I and Patriot Act 2 are unconstitutional and must be struck down as such, because they violate the fourth, fifth, ninth and first amendments to the US Constitution, by permitting the government to spy on Americans and violate their rights to privacy, and because the Patriot Acts, like the war in Iraq, were passed under false and fraudulent circumstances presented by defendants to the Congress.

The suit argues that to the extent that the US Constitution is legally analogous to a "contract" between the government and the plaintiffs (taxpayers), it seems that deliberate fraud by defendants should nullify any unconstitutional acts by them, such as the aggressive war and occupation of Iraq and the Patriot Acts.

The Plaintiffs believe they have the right to bring this suit as American citizens and that they face an imminent threat to their freedom from defendants, arising out of the entire orchestrated scenario of 9/11, the PA laws that were passed as a proximate result of 9/11, and the actions of defendants in infringing on their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.

911review.org strongly supports Stanley Hilton's courageous actions to hold the officials responsible for the 9/11 massacres liable to punishment, and to repeal the Fraudulent Legislation such as the Patriot Act.

Hilton is persisting in this legal action despite threats to his life and we call on all our readers to support his actions by all means necessary. Please donate generously to the 9/11 Victims Legal Fund.

I got a bridge with pretty lights I'll sell ya.

Stanley G. Hilton is obviously an idiot as are those that buy into this crap.

It is unconstitutional and illegal because the president violated the Separation of Powers provisions of the Constitution by deliberately lying to the Congress by falsely assuring them that Bush had evidence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, and that Iraq was involved in plotting and carrying out the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade center Twin Towers and the Pentagon Attack - attacks actually orchestrated by defendants. The suit also alleges that the USA Patriot Act I and Patriot Act 2 are unconstitutional and must be struck down as such, because they violate the fourth, fifth, ninth and first amendments to the US Constitution, by permitting the government to spy on Americans and violate their rights to privacy, and because the Patriot Acts, like the war in Iraq, were passed under false and fraudulent circumstances presented by defendants to the Congress.

why because an American citizen wants both the president and other government officials to follow the law of the land, the United States constitution! bush swore with his hand on a bible that he would up hold and defend the constitution and his is not. you don't think the patriot act is unconstitutional. you believe Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11. Cmon, bin laden has not even by charged with 9/11. all the 9/11 conspiracies aside, the patriot act, executive orders and presidential directives are unconstitutional. lying to congress so he can start a pre-emptive war with Iraq. which has caused the death of thousands of people on both sides and even more seriously injuried. you may want to be in a war, but some of us want it to end and end NOW! all american citizens should want the patriot act repelled and the spying on Americans to stop, stop the national ID act, repell the nafta and drcafta and get this country back on the right track. the track that the fore fathers started. the track that made this country the greatest country on earth. this is America, the land of the free and brave.