In times of national calamity or tragedy it is traditional for the president to address the nation.

Now, in a three day period nearly a trillion dollars has been lost on Wall Street and the president is unseen and unheard from.

It's another Katrina event where the Republican administration seems incapable of honestly addressing a national issue.

Is this leadership?

Don't you think that the president should be addressing the nation?

http://www.whistlestopper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=73859

How do Republicans answer?

QUOTE: 

The President has spoken many times to tis economy and continues to be at work and very active taking unprecedented steps as all can plainly see. (That's a joke)

More anti-Bush rhetoric, and I note the return to Katrina. Another reason this all seem so political. Merely turn and blame Bush, maybe we could get Sean Penn to come to Wall Street.

"Is this leadership?

Don't you think that the president should be addressing the nation?"

Too funny!!!!!

"BUSH TO SPEAK ON U.S. ECONOMY AT 10:15 A.M. ET: WATCH LIVE"

And yesterday Nancy Pelosi was asked if the Democrats had anything to do with this economic meltdown to which she replied with one word. "No."

What a pathetic liar she is. Both parties are just as much to blame and over 300 Washington politicians were on the take in this fiasco. This dates back to Bill Clinton's terms and continues through Bush's terms. We need to have another Boston Tea Party except this time it will take place in Washington D.C. and we'll be throwing politicians in the ocean instead of tea bags.  

Let's see if I understand this.......... Democrats say the President needs to address the country, the Republicans say no he doesn't. The President agrees to address the nation and Republicans scream, see we were right............ LMAO