How else would war be paid for?
I'm thinking maybe more tax dollars from people like you. LMAO...
|
How else would war be paid for?
I'm thinking maybe more tax dollars from people like you. LMAO... |
|
|
|
||
|
There are many way to finance the military. Anyone who wants to be protected should pay. Anyone who doesn't pay, deserves no protection. And of course, during WW2, a large portion of the war effort was financed through the sale of war bonds! |
|
|
You didn't answer the first question. That's a default on your part. And....I wasn't LMAO....
But hiroad has a good point. Define what you consider "war" vs your morals you spoke of. Sometimes that definition gets to fall to the victims.... |
|
|
Looks like davieboy is running away from the very post he started again. Morals; yea, he sure has shown his high moral standards here.
Interesting he would make a statement about war being against his morals when paid for with tax money, when his messiah is continually launching drone and missile strikes into foreign countries with no congressional (or UN) approval, killing many civilians while at it. Whose tax money does he think pays for those drone and missle attacks?
With his new high moral standard, how can he accept his tax money being used for acts of war by his president? But does he have one statement anywhere against nobama's illegal acts of war? NOPE! (Rhymes with HOPE and is more present anyway!)
Who sent troops into Uganda last October?
What about 12,000 US troops to Lybia? A black Democrat former congresswoman told on nobama to the world about this one a month ago: http://www.countercurrents.org/mckinney150112.htm
The great uniter, huh? |