TP, I would be interested in your words and what you found out from reputable sources instead of a reprint of another biased persons blog. 

As I would be just as interested in your words on the matter. I've done some, admittedly little, research into this topic. What you called a bias blog was actually pretty accurate on the details as far as I can tell. It does leave exact $$$ amounts in question, but suggests the need for an audit.

I also agree that Beck presented nothing he hasn't said on his shows and to a much wider audience. This makes the motives questionable. Could greed be his motive? Seems logical outside of another answer.

We've all experienced your examples of logic before and let me be perfectly clear - your logic don't always "wash".

You attack when you don't like the message. Not a good debate skill and it certainly doesn't challenge what has been written.