100 Reasons to Reinvestigate 9/11        

  the blue pill people

Defining Sovereign Citizens

"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." —Thomas Jefferson

Introduction

The recent unrest of people in America has been on the rise due to loss of jobs and other material possessions. Many people have come to understand there was a change in government after the Civil War and are now seeing a loss of liberties and more control. They are now seeking remedy to this situation. In seeking remedies they have uncovered one of the changes in the political and legal system that transpired. This issue is the citizenship that changed of which creates federal control of people of the states. Most of these people have honorable intentions and are just looking for remedy; however there are some who may be misled by others who appear to be into dishonorable things. It appears that the government has termed all such truth seekers "Sovereign Citizens" and is now demonizing all of them.

Facts Surrounding Sovereign Citizens

The Fourteenth Amendment is the direct cause of the so-called the "Sovereign Citizen" movement. This amendment did two main things: 1) Created a dual citizenship on the people in the states which pulled them into the control of Congress; 2) Extended federal protections to corporations. The amendment caused multiple tools of intrusion to be developed by the legislatures so that people could be controlled by law via the States and the United States. This included the spawning of several agencies that people are subject to. It also has given corporations equal, or at times, superior power over the people of America.

People's Awareness Coalition and Nationality

The People's Awareness Coalition (PAC) does not advocate the so-called sovereign citizen position. There are factors that are much more precise that we have found that are more applicable to the current situation during the installation of the 14th Amendment. Nationality of our states over the United States nationality is our immediate remedy for protecting our natural rights under the Constitution.

Distinction between People's Awareness Coalition and Attorneys

The People's Awareness Coalition has the goal in educating people of America in reference to the change of government that happened after the Civil War. In contraposition to the attempt to educate people, attorneys believe they have a monopoly on the law and keep their trade secrets to themselves. They have the attitude that their shit don't stink; and accordingly treat anyone who is not in their circle like they are inferior. To protect their monopoly and stream of enormous income, some seek to ridicule and destroy people of America rather than make an attempt to educate them.

The Ability To Maintain Control

As the corporate structure benefits immensely from this system under the 14th Amendment, there is a need to keep it in existence. To maintain control of this system, there has to be a multitude of devices used. Race strife is one of the major tools used by the controllers. The race card emerges when anyone challenges the amendment. This was the main public sales tool to sell the amendment in the first place. Of course, with a little research one will find it is a farce. Agent Provocateur programs are another method of obfuscation for the benefactors to maintain control of the created empire. Disinformation is established on many fronts for would-be patriots to use and possibly get in legal trouble, or get sent down a wrong path. It also serves as a tool of ridicule in order to demonize anyone that would expose the system. It further creates massive income for the law industry through legal fees, and money for the prison industry.  

The States are Republics

Alexander Hamilton, the main architect for the Constitution for the United States for America, set forth in Federalist Paper number 9 that all the states are republics in the United States federation:

“As this government is composed of small republics, it enjoys the internal happiness of each.”

These republics have, or had, their own unique nationality and citizenship until it was interfered with by the federal government with its 14th Amendment. The new system operates on a thing called cooperative federalism. Of course there are other words for this that obfuscate the actual political plan: one of them being the common one termed "Democracy". Karl Marx drafted the blueprint for its operation.

14th Amendment creates De facto system

Having an alternate political system creates if not a new, but different, governmental system. As a new political body was created by adding the federal -- or so-called national -- citizenship and wherefore disenfranchising state citizens, the governmental system under the 14th Amendment is noted as de facto. In reference of defining a de facto government, the following is evidenced:

·         de facto government. A new government which exercises undisputed sway over the entire country, the former established government having been nullified by successful rebellion or having lost the support of the people.

A de facto government arises where the established government has been subverted by rebellion, so that the new government exercises undisputed sway for the time being over the entire country, or where the people of any portion of a country subject to the same government throw off their allegiance to that government and establish one of their own, and show not only that they have established a government, but also their ability to maintain it. Am J Rev ed Internat L § 12 (International Law)

Noting that citizenship determines the political affiliations that maintains a state or country, people have thrown off their fidelity or "allegiance" to the lawful political system of the Constitution and opted for the new one created by the 14th Amendment. We have briefly gone over how it is "maintained" : attorneys, fear, disinformation, and multiple levels established by multi-national corporations are major tools.

The rightful, or de jure, principles are still there or else it would not be a de facto government. Like a parasite, this new governmental system has attached itself to the Constitution and uses its blood thus goes undetected. The demonized "sovereign citizens" strive to be a part of the de jure system.

Authorities in support of political change:

De jure Citizen(s) Reference :  “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passed on that subject. Approved April 14, 1802. Section 1. Be it enacted, &c, That any alien ... may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them..." The verbiage "..., or any of them" shows that there were citizens of each state distinct from a so-called "federal" or "citizen of the United States" citizenship.

The Intent of the 14th Amendment : "We intend to make citizenship National. Heretofore, a man has been a citizen of the United States because he was a citizen of some-one of the States: now, we propose to reverse that, and make him a citizen of any State where he chooses to reside, by defining in advance his National citizenship—and our Amendment declares that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” Page 64, The Reconstruction Problem, speech of James Blaine, Skowhegan, Maine (August 29, 1866)

Disenfranchisement of De jure Citizens : Dyett v. Turner, 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403 (1968). Also see Section 2 of the 14th Amendment which causes the actual "rebellion" by operation of law and the disenfranchisement of the lawful citizens of the several republics in the Union.

Download the paper "Historical Error" on the subject : www.pacinlaw.org/error

Authorities in support of legal change:

Instead of people being men and women and subject only to public law, they are "legal entities" under the 14th Amendment virtually full-time and "controlled" by the legislatures in all respects: 

      Citizen of a State:

·   A citizen of the United States, residing in any state of the Union;

·   Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

 See citizens resident in the state.

Citizens resident in The State:

·     Natural Persons who are citizens and residents, and

·     Corporations chartered in the State.

—Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, Third Edition

Excerpts from The Institutes of Roman Law, by Rudolph Sohm (1892), the Law of Persons–

·         The conception of a ‘juristic person’ was unknown to the earlier Roman law. The jus privatum was throughout a law for the individual only, and hence—as far as the old private law of Rome was concerned—there could be no subject of rights and duties other than a natural person, i.e. an individual. Roman private law had originally no room for gigantic corporate personalities so vastly exceeding the dimensions of the individual personality. Originally, it was neither capable not desirous of supplying the law for any other proprietary relations but those of private persons in the strictest sense of the term, i.e. individual persons. Nevertheless the Roman lawyers succeeded, as we have seen, in securing the recognition of corporations within the domain of private law.

So you see, the lawyers of America did the same thing to the people of the several republics that the lawyers did to the people of Rome. The 14th Amendment empowered corporations with property rights and protections just as if they were people. This was the true purpose of the Civil War.         

The Rightful System of Law:

Below is the description of the Common Law system, over the current Natural Person system:

·         COMMON LAW. As distinguished from statutory law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs. It consists of those principles, usage and rules of action applicable to government and security of persons and property which do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition

Medical historian Susan Reverby, author of "Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and Its Legacy" discusses the history of medical experimentation at home and abroad

PsyOps? PsyWar - already here and you are the victims. Wake UP!

We the People Foundation Chairman, Bob Schulz joins Gary Franchi for a special interview to respond the the recent allegations by Time Magazine that he "has reached the brink of calling for war."

truth about the gulf oil spill

Israel in America - Obama's Dance Of Death
By Eric Walberg
10-6-10

What are we to make of the latest changes in Obama's entourage, ponders Eric Walberg
 
Obama has just lost his close friend and chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, who is making the unusual transition from national to municipal politics. He is also losing his closest adviser David Axelrod (pragmatist Emanuel described their difference as prose versus poetry) and his mentor and director of the National Economic Council Larry Summers.
 
Why are Obama's three closest advisers -- all Jewish -- leaving? There is no pat answer. Axelrod is no friend of Summers, having suggested in an email the latter would be more comfortable in the "cafeteria at Goldman Sachs". He claims he is homesick. Obama's Keynesianism probably finally got to Summers, who prefers tax cuts. Emanuel, a former congressman, a talented ballet dancer, son of an Irgun terrorist, and an Israeli soldier during the first Gulf war against Iraq, leads us to the real answer.
 
As a very, very strong Zionist (dual citizen? sayan?), he is Israel's canary in the White House. Israel boycotted Obama's UN speech at the Millennium Goals Summit in September, and has subjected Obama to dose after dose of humiliating treatment, the latest when Netanyahu asked for the pardon of Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard (serving a life sentence) in exchange for a temporary halt in settlement expansion. Netanyahu defiantly visited Pollard in jail in 2002 and he is celebrated as a hero in yearly commemorations in Israel. There seems to be an eerie replay of 1991, the last time the White House seriously tried to stop the settlements. The Israel lobby abandoned Bush then and destroyed him in the 1992 elections.
 
The writing is on the wall: Obama is a one-term president. That is if he is even allowed to finish his first term. Obama was never popular in Israel. When he tried to add Israeli critic Chas Freeman to his team as chair of the National Intelligence Council in 2009 AIPAC blew a fuse. Now there are even threats against his life as a result of his stance on settlements and his reluctance to attack Iran. Loud protests in front of Netanyahu's residence witness crowds burning effigies of Obama "the new Pharaoh", "the descendant of slaves" who must be put in his place.
 
Obama, son of a Kenyan Muslim and American expat radical, is facing equally vicious bigotry by non-Jews. He is attacked at home by Americans of more traditional backgrounds who call him a communist and are incensed by his unusual origins and his unrepresentativ..e entourage. Apocalyptic movements and rightwing "patriotic" militias, which grew under Clinton but abated under Bush junior, are increasing rapidly under Obama, and more staid but equally frustrated Americans conduct political "tea parties", confused and desperate for both stability and real change.
 
For despite the radically different appearance of Obama's "change" administration (including the colourful Emanuel), his policies have provided neither stability nor any real change. They are remarkably like those of his predecessor. The unwieldy and disappointing healthcare reform aside, the bankers and generals have been given just about whatever they ask for, Guantanamo stays open and torture continues. US troops stay in Iraq and Afghanistan. The economic morass Obama inherited from Bush merely deepens.
 
And what is Emanuel's legacy? According to critics, he was responsible for scuttling the real public healthcare option, leaving it in the hands of private insurers. He was courted by a litany of Wall Street officials and business leaders from day one. Emanuel's White House calendar was filled with the likes of Comcast VP David Cohen (who just happened to have mergers pending), Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon, and New York Daily News owner Mortimer Zuckerman, who showed up three times in two months.
 
With the Republicans poised to take control of one or both houses in November, Rahmbo, as he is affectionately known for his ruthless strong-arm tactics in the political ring, can safely jump ship just before it sinks. He is clearly betting that his friendship with Chicago's darling, America's first black president, will see him to victory in safely Democratic Chicago.
 
But, why the municipal ring? Yes, his "friend" Obama is toast. But is it possible Emanuel's sudden interest in local politics is because he realises presidents, senators and the like have very little real power to make decisions anyway? That a mayor can at least leave a visible legacy -- bike paths, community centres, parks? Or is he just bored, looking for a challenge where he can flex his muscles anew, flit gracefully across the political stage yet again as prince charming seducing the sleeping Miss America?
 
Whatever his motives, Rahmbo epitomises the shallowness, the effeteness of American politics today. The president of the most powerful nation on earth is powerless. A stuffed shirt. A photo op. A cultured Afro-American presiding over the most brutal empire the world has every known. Emanuel "made him" and has decided to leave him to his fate, to yet again play games with the US media and political circles, like a virtual performer orchestrating a grand reality game.
 
Pundits are mixed in assessing his chances. His strongest supporters are Chicago's white moneyed class and the business community, who favour Emanuel's run because of his history as a Washington power broker, says political analyst Charles Dunn. "His pockets are overflowing with IOUs" and he will be able to call in past favours, giving him a huge advantage over his many competitors.
 
But he has little appeal to the 35 per cent of Chicagoans who are black and the 28 per cent who are Hispanic. His challengers are predominantly minority candidates, including James Meeks, a state senator and Baptist minister, and Chicago City Clerk Miguel del Valle. Many minority leaders, including several aldermen, have already made statements saying they will not support Emanuel's candidacy. The field is very much open. In fact the call among those unhappy with machine politics in the Chicago is "Abre" -- "Anyone but Rahm Emanuel", which translates into Spanish as "Open".
 
As a Jew, Emanuel is very much a supporter of minority rights, but these real minorities understand that Jewish support for them from the likes of Rahmbo is only skin deep, so to speak. CNN's Hispanic host Rick Sanchez shocked Americans last week for saying as much on air. Sanchez is constantly ridiculed by Jewish TV satirist Jon Stewart, and finally fought back, calling Stewart a "bigot" with "a white liberal establishment point-..of-view", saying CNN and the media are largely run by Jews and elitists. Of course, he was immediately fired, but no one can dispute the truth behind his outburst. Says analyst Peter Myers, "Other minorities are accorded status only on condition that the Jewish minority remains number one."
 
Compounding Emanuel's difficulties is the expected candidacy of Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, who is white (but not Jewish), and well-liked among black and Latino voters because of his highly publicised refusal to evict renters of foreclosed buildings and his prosecution of the owners of a historic black cemetery who illegally exhumed 300 bodies for profit.
 
Is any of this of importance to the world at large? Do the departures of Emanuel, Axelrod and Summers portend a more even-handed policy on the Middle East -- a defiance of Israel in the remaining two years of his one-term presidency? Will he suddenly cut Israel's massive aid budget and insist it withdraw from occupied lands? Will (largely Jewish) bankers and other elite miscreants be subpoenaed and jailed for their many crimes, as happened to an earlier Chicagoan, Moses Annenberg, who was jailed for tax evasion in the 1930s under president Roosevelt?
 
The answer is of course "no". I mention Annenberg, because he was a Jewish Chicago media magnate and underworld figure brought down by a president who still wielded some power. His son Walter Annenberg continued in his father's less-..than-pristine footsteps, but covered them with the Annenberg Foundation, lavishing money on "good causes". He rightly realised he could use a liberal facade and his newspapers to make or break politicians, rather than be broken by them.
 
Like Obama and Emanuel, Annenberg's story is the stuff of legend. His publishing empire grew and grew, he was Nixon's ambassador to the UK and so charmed the Queen that she made him an honourary knight (Americans disdain such unseemly titles). All the time he was "conservative" Ronald Reagan's "best friend" according to Nancy Reagan.
 
The "liberal" Barack Obama first gained political prominence as an activist with the Annenberg Foundation's Education Challenge. Annenberg, who died in 2002, would be delighted to know his charitable works in Chicago helped elect the first black president, whose "Israel first!" chief of staff would go on to become the city's first Jewish mayor, putting the real minorities in their place. Will Emanuel sail to victory on a pro-Israeli whirlwind, or can a plucky Dart prick the Zionist balloon and bring the circus to a halt?

  9/11 firefighters--THREE explosions after plane hit WTC1

G.Edward Griffin talks about chemtrail film

david icke: human race, get off your knees