Community Board Minutes

Community Board Minutes October 10, 2001

FULL BOARD MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, October 10, 2001
NYU MEDICAL CENTER
FIRST AVENUE


HON. Martin J. Barrett, Chair


ATTENDANCE


Members answering first roll call:
Barrett, Bing, Buchwald, Collins, Disman, Emerman, Frank, Friedman, Garodnick, Gelber, Hirsch, Hollander, Imbimbo, Judge, Kaplan, Lynn, Martino, McGinn, McIntosh, Milton, Monterossa, Oddo, Papush, Portnoy, Reiss, Ross, Rubin, Schachter, Schwartz, Sepersky, Simmelkjaer, Taylor (Dean Clarke), Taylor (Mark Adams), Tu, Winfield

Members answering second roll call:
Barrett, Bing, Buchwald, Cohen, Collins, Disman, Doukas, Emerman, Frank, Friedman, Garodnick, Gelber, Hirsch, Hollander, Imbimbo, Judge, Kaplan, Lynn, Martino, McGinn, McIntosh, Milton, Oddo, Papush, Portnoy, Reiss, Ross, Rubin, Schachter, Schwartz, Sepersky, Simmelkjaer, Taylor (Dean Clarke), Taylor (Mark Adams), Tu, Winfield

Excused
Cohen, Levinson

Absent (Members not present or not answering one or both roll calls):
Angelakos, Arcaro, Doukas, Dresselhuys, Shaw, Swanson, West, Zeichner

Guests signing in:
Vanessa Bravo, Stein Senior Center; Andrew Ashkenase, Asm. Ravitz’s Office; Brian Miller, Mayor’s Office; Phil Craft, Rep. Maloney’s Office; Justin Handman, Sen. Goodman; Amelia Schartz, NYPL; Ann Duggan, Coalition for the Homeless; Cecelia Penkola; R. Cicculi; Kristine Dessberg; Jeff Newman; Lucy Mayo, Sen. Duane’s Office; Marian Burnbaum; James J. Wilson; T. Huima; Mark Vogel, Asm. Gottfried’s office; C.A. Rhodes; Gail Lott; Andrew Smith, City Planning; Jane R. Crotty; Linda Nevins, Patrick Griffin









Meting Called to Order

Martin J. Barrett announced that the proposed drop-in center was not on the agenda that evening. He said that Deborah Kaplan would give a summary of what took place at that committee meeting. There would be no updates nor would a resolution be offered that evening. Mr. Barrett explained that neither Grand Central Neighborhood Social Service (GCNSS)
or the City has moved forward on the proposed location. He then called the meeting to order.

Amendments to the Agenda

Mr. Barrett noted the proposed changes to the agenda and called for its adoption. By a voice vote, the amended agenda was adopted.

PUBLIC SESSION

Phil Craft reported that Rep. Carolyn Maloney sent a letter the previous day, which she organized 28 other Congress Members to co-sign, to Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan to investigate “predatory lenders.” These lenders target vulnerable consumers, and use pressure tactics to get them to take high-interest loans. The Reserve has the existing authority to pressure those lenders out of those practices. She specifically calls for studies on women and minorities who are being targeted for those types of loans. The Congress Member also sent a letter to HUD Regional Director, regarding Phipps Plaza South encouraging HUD to guarantee a second mortgage on the building so the funds could be used specifically to fix the leaks and other conditions that create mold. Mr. Craft reported that Rep. Maloney met with the President of Peru when he was in New York recently and appealed to him to free Lori Berenson, an American jailed on charges of terrorism.

Jessica Lappin reported that Council Member Gifford Miller's Office has received calls regarding the M57 changing its route and the loss of two stops on 55th Street. The Office has been collecting signatures for petitions to keep the two stops and change their planned rerouting. Ms. Lappin recommended people call the Council Member's office for information on how to get involved and to sign a petition.

Darlene Fein Erdtrachter said that she opposes the proposed drop-in center on 34th Street. She is particularly concerned that the center would be close to PS116 on 33rd Street, where her child attends. Ms. Fein Erdtrachter said that, recently, a man and his pitbulls were loitering outside the school and one of the dogs attacked a student. She appealed to the Board to consider having a drop-in center that was not in proximity of a school. She also said that St. Vartan's park has become a homeless haven.

June Terry, affiliated with the Rosehill Community organization, said that she opposed the proposed drop-in center on 34th Street and urges other to as well. She said that there are about 900 senior citizens in the area. Ms. Terry said that she has seen and heard that homeless people expose themselves and urinate in public and she is concerned about the well-being of children who are subject to these incidences. She also said that, in her opinion, there are plenty of social services in the district.

Mona Younis suggested that more information should be gathered about the drop-in center before attacking the proposed site. She said that she witnessed how Jeff Grunberg, Director of the GCNSS, was treated disrespectfully at other meetings. She said that she was disappointed in her community for not making thoughtful inquiries and offering serious and responsible approaches or take a rational position. Ms. Younis said that no one tried to organize a committee to visit the current site to see how GCNSS operates and to formulate questions and observations. She said that no one suggested getting stats from the city about crimes around shelters in the City or similar information to see if fears are justified or perpetuated. She said that she attended the Rosehill meeting in the previous week where she found that a number of unfounded charges were made. Ms. Younis said that she went to the shelter at different times of the day and documented no harassment. She said that she asked businesses in the area for their impression of the center. She also observed that the trash was neatly stacked, contrary to one of the concerns raised by a resident. She said that she is not suggesting there are no safety concerns. She said that she is concerned that voicing hysterical fears may ruin chances to get the City to listen. Ms. Younis recommends that more information should be collected in order to make a rational case.

Asm. John Ravitz said that he opposes the loss of two bus stops on the M57. He attended the June 17th hearing at the MTA where he heard testimony opposing the proposed rerouting and he has also received other negative feedback. He said that he would continue to work with the Board and community groups opposing the proposed changes. He reported that the M57 would not be on that month's MTA agenda. Asm. Ravitz announced the time and location of the upcoming Trump World Tower CAC and gave some background as to how the CAC came about. The Assembly Member announced that there would be a town hall meeting on September 25th at the Park East Synagogue to discuss some important changes to benefits that senior citizens need to know about. A panel of experts and representatives from various city agencies would be on hand to discuss these changes. Asm. Ravitz announced that in response to the over 1 million children reported missing annually, he has teamed up with Duane Reade and the 17th Precinct for Project Kid Care. On October 14th from 11-6pm, parents are invited to bring their children to his district office for fingerprinting, taking photographs, and recording descriptive details that would be available in case of a kidnapping. Asm. Ravitz also announced his annual Health Care fair would be on October 25th at Lenox Hill Neighborhood House. Department of Health will be give free flu shots, major hospitals will be there for free screenings. Ted Lynn thanked the Assembly Member for bus support. Asm. Ravitz said that he does not believe the routes for the articulated buses are well planned. Mr. Lynn asked if he would approve of a moratorium on purchasing until further studies have been conducted. Asm. Ravitz said that he would and would continue to talk to President Reuter. Sherman Hollander said that he has observed one bus runs every hour and the wait is inconvenient. Asm. Ravitz said that he has heard there are safety concerns. Clara Reiss said that the articulated buses are not wheelchair friendly. This is a problem considering that there is a cluster of hospitals and senior houses around 23rd Street. Sylvia Friedman added that the Public Advocate’s office received a letter from Disabled in Action about the wheelchair inaccessibility of the buses. Gerard Schriffin asked about the drop-in center. Asm. Ravitz said that his office has received close to 200 letters. However, the proposed location is not in his district, and he said it would not be appropriate for him to get involved beyond sending a letter to the Mayor saying that he has received correspondence.

Cecilia Penkola, a resident of 29th Street who has worked with homeless people, said that she is familiar with how shelters are run and they are often poorly staffed. She said that she feels that the community did not have a chance to ask Jeff Grunberg of GCNSS concrete questions. Ms. Penkola said that the Rosehill Community Association was collecting information on services in the area to illustrate that the district has its fair share. She also said that the Commissioner of the Department of Homeless Services has not returned calls, faxes, or e-mails.

Roger Montesano from the Community Relations Bureau of the Fire Department reported that FDNY, the Board of Education, the Department of Health, and the Mayor's office are working together to promote the new health insurance program that covers children under the age of 18. Mr. Montesano encouraged audience members who may be eligible to enroll to do so. He brought brochures and also flyers with fire tips. Someone asked him if fire alarms should be on the ceiling. Mr. Montesano said that that is the preferred location. He also reminded everyone to change the batteries in their smoke alarms.

Patricia McMahon said that she has been a resident in the area for 23 years. She shared some observations that have contributed to her opposition to a drop-in shelter. She said that in the previous week, she saw a man defecate on the sidewalk on 32nd and 3rd and that a few years ago, a man waved a broken bottle in her and her children’s faces. Ms. McMahon said that St. Vartan’s has become unsafe due to the increased number of homeless people there. Bathrooms are unusable. She said that she feels the community is saturated with social service facilities and does not need another one.

Mickey Egeth gave some background to her credentials. She lives across the street from the proposed shelter site. She said that in 1961 she began campaigning for a traffic study to address the problems at the midtown tunnel entrance on 34th Street. The Department of Transportation said that they would not put a traffic light by the intersection near the tunnel entrance for fear that traffic would be backed-up to Second Avenue. After 20 years, a light was finally put up. She said that she recognized that this area is a politically sensitive issue for some officials; however, a traffic study is needed in light of the proposed center. Ms. Egeth prepared a draft resolution requesting an Environmental Impact Statement study, and submitted it to the chair of the Transportation Committee with the expectation for it to be considered that evening. She said that Lou Sepersky told her that the Human Services Committee would be addressing the proposed drop-in center and therefore the Transportation Committee would not consider her draft resolution. As the Human Services Committee did not have a resolution on the drop-in center that evening, Ms. Egeth requested that the Transportation Committee review her draft resolution and the Board vote on it.

Chris Byrne spoke on behalf of the Ruan Corp. which submitted a street activity permit application. He said that there would be music and crafts at the event and part of the proceeds would benefit the soup kitchen at Our Lady of the Scapular Church. Lyle Frank asked what kind of business the Ruan Corp. engaged in. Mr. Byrne said they are the owners of Rocky Sullivans bar. Someone asked if alcohol would be served. Mr. Byrne said that beer/wine would be sold from a stand in front of the bar. Someone asked if the crafts would be sold. Mr. Byrne said they would be and part of the proceeds would go to the Church as well. Maxine McIntosh asked if they would consider having the fair on a side street. Mr. Byrne said that that would be fine.

Carol Schachter read the roll call. See APPENDIX A.

PUBLIC SESSION continued

Senator Roy Goodman said that he opposes the idea of a drop-in center in Rosehill. He spoke about the Hate Crimes bill that finally passed last session, the gun control bill, Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances bill, some health issues that he has supported including AIDS research, expanded health insurance coverage, and arts funding. The Senator thanked those who have supported him and those he has worked with.


PUBLIC HEARINGS

Carlton S. Mitchell, Deputy Commissioner, Community Development, NYC Department of Youth and Community Development, began his presentation promoting the Neighborhood Advisory Boards by thanking Steve Portnoy for inviting him. Mr. Mitchell explained that the Department primarily serves low-income people in the community. The Department sends out RFPs for Community Service Block Grants, a federally funded program. Funds are allocated to communities throughout the City based on percentage of poverty. Organizations seeking funding must be community-based, and provide a site in the community. Mr. Mitchell explained that the Neighborhood Advisory Board helps assess and prioritize the community's needs that would lead to RFPs. The Advisory Board also evaluates the program proposals and assist in selecting the organizations that would be awarded. The Board consists of six members appointed by the commissioner and six by local officials. Mr. Mitchell said the only requirements are that applicants should be concerned citizen, 18 or older, without conflicts of interest with applicants. The Board meets every third Thursday of the month to discuss needs of the community. He said the only requirements for the organization is that it should serve the community and have a site in the community. Mr. Mitchell said that they are now taking applications for the new term that starts on November 1, 2001. Sherman Hollander said that he has been a member for two years and thinks the committee is ridiculous because nothing can be done for another two years. Mr. Mitchell explained that grants are for 3-year blocks. Maxine McIntosh asked Mr. Mitchell to name some
of the organizations or services in this current cycle. Mr. Mitchell did not know off-hand, he said to contact the office. Clara Reiss said she quit that Board because of shortcomings. Jim Collins expressed interest in applying for membership. Ellen Imbimbo asked where the next meeting would be. Mr. Mitchell provided information about the next meeting. Peter Doukas expressed concern and suggested that one of the Board Committee's should address and evaluate the shortcomings of this Advisory Board. Marty Barrett said it should be referred to Business and Governmental Affairs. Steve Portnoy explained that the expressed discontentment by current members and lack of information about community needs was why he invited Mr. Mitchell that evening.

BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS

1. Application for an Unenclosed Sidewalk Café from Nations Café, 875 First Avenue at 49th Street

Tim McGinn reported that the original application included 22 tables and 44 seats. At the Committee meeting, the Café agreed to change its application to nine tables and nineteen seats. Architect Steve Wygoda came forward with revised blueprints. Mr. Wygoda said that the tables would be on the side street, lined up along the wall. Mr. Wygoda explained that the last table would have three seats and per City Planning, there would be a regulation height rail. At an audience member’s request, Mr. Wygoda drew a diagram of the layout on the blackboard since the blueprints were difficult to read. Mr. Wygoda also said that the cafe would be 9 foot 7 inches from a pole. Someone asked how much space there was for the wait staff. Mr. Wygoda said three feet, the minimum for handicap accessibility. Alfred Milton asked how far it would be from First Avenue. Mr. Wygoda said about 7 feet. Someone asked about the owners and how long the establishment has been in business. One of the owners came forward and explained that the cafe was established in November 1999, and changed ownership March of this year. Bruce Silberblatt said that he does not think that a cafe would be a good idea. He said that that corner is one of the worst traffic corners in the district because it is right by an exit from the FDR. Buses turn up constantly, and thus, there is a great deal of exhaust. He asked that the Board oppose the application. Mr. Silberblatt said there are no cafes on side streets from the Sutton area to the 59th Street Bridge. He also said that the owners did not inform the Turtle Bay Association.

LAND USE AND LANDMARKS

1. Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for 5 Tudor City Place

Edward Rubin introduced the application for a glass penthouse/conservatory on the roof of 5 Tudor City Place. He said that based on the photos presented at the committee meeting, it could barely be seen. But it would be visible from various parts of Manhattan and within the neighborhood. Mr. Rubin said that the committee could not reach a consensus. He asked if anyone was present on behalf of the applicant. No one was.

George Brown, President of the Tudor City Association, reported that the executive committee of the Tudor City Association unanimously opposed the application. He said that the greenhouse would not be built in Tudor style. While it would not, technically, be in the public way, it would be visible. He also said that the materials presented at the meeting did not give a good indication of how it may be visible from the public way. The applicant has proposed minor changes to the structures but the Association remains opposed as long as it is visible from the street. He asked the Board to protect the Tudor City buildings
and the historic district.

Audrey Allen of Tudor City said that approving this structure may start a dangerous trend. The building is landmarked and should remain that way. She asked the Board to oppose the application.
Jack Taylor, a member of the Historic District Council reported that the Council testified at the Landmarks Preservation Commission’s hearing on July 25th. He read the testimony stating the Council’s Certificate of Appropriateness Committee opposed the application. He said that they believe that rooftop additions on historic buildings should be invisible from the public way. The proposed greenhouse additions would be very visible, and would detract from the distinctive roof silhouette and wonderful features for which the building is designated.

Edward Rubin made a general policy statement about how important it is to the Board that applicants are prepared and take the presentations seriously. He said that committee chairs should urge applicants to make presentations in a clear and organized manner so that the Board may make informed decisions.

2. Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for 216 East 17th Street

Gary Papush introduced the following hearing for 216 East 17th Streets. There were no speakers. Mr. Papush defended the architect’s absence as it was indicated at the committee that their presentation was satisfactory. He also said that a representative from a local organization at the committee did not oppose to the application. Jack Taylor, a member of the Stuyvesant Park Neighborhood Association, added that they too were satisfied with the presentation and did not object.

3. Amster Yard

Architect, Nancy Goshow introduced herself, a representative from Ad Hoc, an architectural firm, and three others from her office for a presentation on the proposed installation at Amster Yard. Ms. Goshow brought several visuals including a model, and poster boards with photos and illustrations of the revisions based on comments from the Committee and the Turtle Bay Association. The representative from Ad Hoc provided some background on the applicant, the Cervantes Institute which is currently located on 22nd Street. He said that the Institute is the cultural arm of the Spanish Government, and serves to educate people about Spanish arts. There are 35 facilities worldwide, 25 of which are housed in historic buildings, as is Amster Yard. The new space will be used for educational purposes as well. Ms. Goshow explained that the presentation that evening incorporated comments and suggestions made at the committee meeting, as well as comments by the Turtle Bay Association at a presentation earlier that week and from the Institute. Ms. Goshow said that the goals of this project are to: 1) modify three multi-tenant buildings to house one user; 2) fit the program needs of a cultural facility into three separate buildings; 3) enlarge the garden; and 4) provide horizontal ventilation between front and back buildings. She provided some history about the building and photos of the building's major metamorphoses over the years. She explained that one of the major undertakings would be to level the floors of both buildings to make it accessible and raise the windows of 215 East 49th Street to match the floors and windows of 213; enclose the existing colonade to connect the buildings for heating, utility, and egress reasons; add volume in front of an existing building by removing 10% of the back building to give floor area available as the air rights were sold; and add a balcony to connect buildings from front to back. Ms. Goshow also said that manufactured brick would be removed and the slate walkway would be restored. Ellen Imbimbo asked if the building is landmarked. Ms. Goshow said that the courtyard is landmarked. Anne Emerman asked if ADA regulations were followed. Ms. Goshow said they were. Jack Taylor asked Ms. Goshow if she had the 1966 landmark designation report to share with the Board. She did not, but Gary Papush did. Ms. Goshow read it aloud. Phil Cohen asked if there were transportation issues. Ms. Goshow does not believe there would be problems considering the surrounding area already had commercial spaces.

Bruce Silberblatt said that he was impressed with the accommodation of suggestions and by the presentation that evening. He said that, on behalf of the Turtle Bay Association, he supported and welcomed the Institute.
4. Text change to modify city's sign regulations
Edward Rubin explained that this was the second piece of the overall zoning revision to the text. He introduced Andrew Smith, from the Department of City Planning who discussed the proposed text amendment on advertising signs that were specific to the district. Mr. Smith explained that the areas affected by the amendment have specific manufacturing zones. This would impact the waterfront at Con Edison at Waterside, former Kips Bay site, the Con Ed plant 14th street, along the FDR drive, and the waterfront area south of Beekman Place, UN area, and Stuyvesant Cove Park. Currently there are no restrictions in the manufacturing zones in terms of surface area, location, projection or height. However, advertising signs are prohibited within 200 feet or in view of public park and designated arterial highways, and there are restrictions in size and distance. The amendment would allow ads in proximity of 200 feet of arterial highways and parks. Flashing business accessory signs would be prohibited within a 50 sq. feet limit within zoning lot of waterfront lots. This would apply to the platform areas between bulkhead/pierhead line extending south from the UN to 14th Street. Restrictions on ad signs within 200 feet would remain. The proposed amendment would allow business accessory signs to be visible with a surface area of 200 sq. feet. Bill Oddo gave a scenario of 3 business with 200 feet max allowed each. Thus, there could a 600 foot sign. Mr. Smith affirmed that that could be possible depending on the measurements of the frontage space.

TRANSPORTATION

1. To co-name East 25th Street between Lexington and Third Avenues, "Bernard Baruch Way"

Jane Crotty, Director of External Affairs at Baruch College, gave a presentation on the proposed co-naming of 25th Street, between Third and Lexington. The new facility is scheduled to open in September 2001. It will replace the buildings currently used by the school at 25th Street and Park Avenue South, and 18th Street and Irving place. Ms. Crotty gave some historical background on the college. Ms. Crotty brought a board with photos to show traffic impacts and a computer rendering of the building at the proposed “Bernard Baruch Way.” Peter Doukas asked if the naming might bring some confusion for emergency vehicles. Ms. Crotty replied, that since it is a co-naming and people will still refer to it as 25th Street, she does not believe it would cause confusion. Jack Taylor asked for clarification on the proposed name. Ms. Crotty explained that “Place” already taken so “Way” was chosen. Edward Rubin asked Ms. Crotty to talk briefly about Bernard Baruch and she obliged. Ellen Imbimbo asked if the street would be a pedestrian way. Ms. Crotty said that she was unaware of any plans. Sylvia Friedman commented on the absence of a left hand turn sign. Ms. Crotty explained that the 13th precinct objects to the turn sign.

BUSINESS SESSION

Adoption of the minutes for June 12, 2000

By a voice vote, the minutes were adopted.

Report from the Chair

Martin J. Barrett reported that a non-profit organization called Neighborhood Links offered their website maintenance services to the Borough President and has received her support. Mr. Barrett has set-up a CB6 website through Neighborhood Links. He described some of the features and said that he emailed information about the website link to board members who have given him email addresses. Mr. Barrett reported that the Borough Board passed a positive resolution on the Kingdom of Bhutan. He also reported that NYC2012 gave a presentation on their design proposal for the bid to host the Olympics. Mr. Barrett announced that orientation the following day would start a half hour earlier than usual. Betty Schwartz suggested that something be said about Steve Rosen since it was the first Board meeting since his untimely death. Phil Cohen suggested that there be a resolution or some formal recognition to his family. Peter Doukas inquired about the possibility of naming Stuyvesant Cove Park in his name or something along those lines. Mr. Barrett said that it would be discussed at the Executive Committee.

Report from the Nominating Committee

Deborah Kaplan explained that those who expressed interest in becoming Chair were interviewed. For Chair, the Committee chose Mark Adams Taylor. From the floor, Antol Herskovitz nominated Sylvia Friedman and it was seconded. Ms. Kaplan announced Tim McGinn for First Vice Chair, Charles Buchwald for Second Vice Chair, Beatrice Disman for Treasurer and Carol Schachter for Secretary. There were no nominations from the floor for any of the above positions. Alfred Milton requested those who were nominated to stand so that new members could see who they are. Martin Barrett reminded everyone that elections would be in October and thanked the committee for their work. Sylvia Friedman asked about the Committee’s exemption from Sunshine Law. Mr. Barrett said that they were in compliance.

District Manager's Report

Carol Pieper announced that repaving would be done on 34th street and 57th street in upcoming weeks. She also reported that she learned from the Budget consultation meetings that a senior services contract was awarded to Lenox Hill Hospital. It is currently in construction in St. Peter’s Church. She did not hear of an opening date. Ms. Pieper said that this will serve an underserved area since there are no facilities between the Stein Center on 25th Street and Lenox Hill Neighborhood House at 70th Street.

Treasurer's Report

Beatrice Disman reported that money from the Sunshine Fund was spent on an obituary placed in the New York Times for Steve Rosen. A donation was also made in his memory, on behalf of the Board, to the Bellevue South Park Association.

Borough President's Office

Noah Pferferblit reported that the Borough President wrote to Martin Osterreich, Commissioner of the Department of Homeless Services regarding the proposed GCNSS drop-in center on 34th Street. He said that she feels that that location would be inappropriate and the Rosehill area is residential and has an unusually large number of services already. It should
be in Grand Central area. She suggested finding a space in a business district and she has requested a meeting with the Commissioner and other elected officials to discuss this and the status of the closing of the 30th Street Men Shelter. She has received a great number of letters about the drop-in center. Mr. Pfefferblit said that the Borough President would be meeting with the Rosehill Community Association the following week to address concerns. Peter Doukas asked if the Borough President’s opinion is conditional on whether or not the 30th Street Men’s shelter exists. Mr. Pfefferblit said that the Borough President feels that the center should not be at that location and she believes there should be a review process. Mr. Pfefferblit said the Borough President’s office has received a lot of negative feedback on the proposed site. Lou Sepersky asked about the Doe Fund’s shelter in Brooklyn and relief of 30th Street. Carol Pieper explained that the Doe Fund has 400-beds in Williamsburg but other accommodations would be needed as well. Ms. Pieper said that DHS is close to closure on another location but she did not know the address. Edward Rubin requested Mr. Pfefferblit ask the Borough President to issue a proclamation for Steve Rosen for his years of public service.

COMMITTEE REPORTS

1. BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS

1a. Application for an Unenclosed Sidewalk Café from Nations Café, 875 First Avenue at 49th Street

Timothy McGinn introduced the resolution. Lyle Frank made a friendly amendment to include a caveat for a ten-foot pedestrian walkway. After some discussion, it was concluded that this amendment would not be adopted because there would not be enough space for a three-foot aisle and a ten-foot walkway. Ted Lynn asked whether the Turtle Bay Association should be consulted and what their objections were. Mr. McGinn said that Bruce Silberblatt spoke during the public hearing and that was sufficient. No other comments, question was called.

WHEREAS, the applicant’s plans allowed only eight feet from the café to the sidewalk initially; and

WHEREAS, the applicant agreed to modify his plans dramatically to meet our guidelines by
eliminating an entire row of 13 tables, leaving only 9 tables; and

WHEREAS, the café is handicap accessible; and

WHEREAS, there will be no raised platforms; and

WHEREAS, the applicant has stated the café will only be open until 10 PM; and

WHEREAS, the applicant understands the need for a public hearing; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, that Community Board Six supports the application for the above unenclosed sidewalk café requested.

PASSED: 29 in Favor, 6 Opposed, 3 Abstentions, 0 Present but not eligible to vote

1b. Application (M6-040) from Gramercy Neighborhood Associates for A Street Activity Permit on Irving Place between East 18th and East 19th Streets on October 28, 2000 (Rain Date: October 29, 2000)

Carol Schachter said that the street activity on Irving Place was just for a few short hours. She also said that Gramercy Neighborhood Associates is a reputable organization and there have never been problems with their events. there would be music and it will be an old-fashioned block party.

WHEREAS, Gramercy Neighborhood Associates has requested a Street Activity Permit in order to have a block party on Saturday, October 28, 2000 on Irving Place between 18th and 19th Streets; and

WHEREAS, there will be no fund raising, nor will vendors be present; and

WHEREAS, this event is sponsored by an organization indigenous to and part of the fabric of the Gramercy Park community; now
THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, that Community Board Six supports the application from Gramercy Neighborhood Associates for a Street Activity Permit for the date and location above.

PASSED: 37 in Favor, 0 Opposed, 0 Abstentions, 1 Present but not eligible to vote

1c. Application for a Street Permit from Ruan Corp. on East 28th Street between Lexington and Third Avenues on October 15, 2000

Ms. Schachter said that, on the outset knowing that this is a tavern and not a non-for-profit, it seemed unlikely the Committee would support the application. However, considering that the Board has approved other benefits sponsored by local establishments as this event would. Per Maxine McIntosh's suggestion, and by agreement of Mr. Byrne representing Ruan Corp., the fair would be on the side street in front of Our Lady of the Scapular. Lyle Frank objected to granting a fair to a for-profit entity and offered explanations of the differences between the other approved applications and the one before them that evening. Anne Emerman said she would support the application as long as it is not on Lexington, a major bus route.

WHEREAS, Ruan Corp. appeared before the Board to answer questions; and

WHEREAS, Ruan changed its application from Lexington Ave., between East 28th and East 29th, to East 28th Street, between Third and Lexington Avenues; and

WHEREAS, the applicant stated that funds raised would be donated to St. Stephens food pantry; and

WHEREAS, the applicant will obtain a letter from St. Stephens and send it to the Board office; and

WHEREAS, this event is not being promoted by a professional enterprise and this is considered a minor street fair; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, that Community Board Six supports the application by Ruan Corp. for a street permit for the date and location above.

PASSED: 30 in Favor, 8 Opposed, 0 Abstentions, and 0 Present but not eligible to vote

Ms. Schachter announced that the next meeting would be on October 18th. Mark Adams Taylor invited all committee chairs to attend and discuss budget priorities. Martin Barrett strongly recommended members attend.

2. LAND USE AND LANDMARKS

2a. Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for 5 Tudor City Place

Gary Papush said that the Committee supports the Tudor City Association’s opposition to the application.
Reasons being that visibility in question and the Tudor architecture on top of building to should be preserved.

WHEREAS, a Certificate of Appropriateness has been applied for by the owner of a penthouse apartment (25th floor) to construct 2 greenhouses on their rooftop; and

WHEREAS, the Tudor City Association believes the proposed greenhouses would be visible from various parts of the Tudor City Historic District and will disrupt the original design of the rooftop and detract in general from the original beauty of the rooftop's architecture; and

WHEREAS, this view is shared by the Historic Districts Council; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, Community Board 6 does not support this application and urges the applicant to design something minimally visible from the public way.

PASSED: 34 in Favor, 4 Opposed, 0 Abstentions, 0 Present but not eligible to vote

2b. Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for 216 East 17th Street

Gary Papush explained that the community association is in support and it is not visible from the public way. Lou Sepersky said that he thought the application would be violating the landmark preservation laws. Ted Lynn asked how the committee voted. Mr. Papush said that everyone approved except for Mr. Sepersky. Jack Taylor said that the addition would not be visible from the public way per regulation and this application satisfies the requirement.

WHEREAS, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has been filed with the Landmarks Preservation Commission for permission to construct a rooftop addition at 216 East 17th Street, in the Stuyvesant Square Historic District; and

WHEREAS, the Property is an Anglo-Italianate style dwelling built circa 1851-1853, the architect of which
is unknown; and

WHEREAS, the applicant's revised presentation indicates that the proposed rooftop addition is to be set far
enough back from the cornice of the house as to be invisible from any vantage point on "the public way";
and

WHEREAS, such a condition satisfies the rule-of-thumb regulation for rooftop additions established by the
Landmarks Preservation Commission for landmarked properties including those in designated historic
districts; and

WHEREAS, the Stuyvesant Park Neighborhood Association noting that this proposal is therefore now in
accordance with the regulation, has no objection to the application; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, that Community Board 6 Manhattan recommends approval of the application for a rooftop
addition at the said property on the understanding it will not be visible from “The Public Way”.

PASSED: 36 in Favor, 2 Opposed, 0 Abstentions, and 0 Present but not eligible to vote

2f. Amster Yard

Gary Papush explained that, at the Committee meeting, the members unanimously opposed the application because the courtyard would be marred by the structure. However, the architects have revamped and improved the design to the satisfaction of the Turtle Bay Association and to the Committee as well.

WHEREAS, Amster Yard, 213-215 East 49th Street was originally constructed in 1869-70 and altered in 1945 by the late James Amster; and

WHEREAS, Amster Yard is a picturesque, L-shaped courtyard and is one of the most charming enclosures in the City; and

WHEREAS, Amster Yard has been purchased by the government of Spain for use by the Spanish Institute and the Cervantes Institute for use as classrooms and public space; and

WHEREAS, they have applied to the Landmarks Preservation Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness to provide a connection between the buildings which will be up against the wall and not intrude into the courtyard, to add an open balcony on top of the building, and to restore the slate walkways; and

WHEREAS, this design is not opposed by the Turtle Bay Association; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, Community Board Six does not oppose approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness.

PASSED: 37 in Favor, 0 Opposed, 1 Abstention, 0 Present but not eligible to vote

2c. Text Change to Modify City’s Sign Regulations

Edward Rubin said that the text change was a bit complicated and technical. The Committee opposes the section pertaining to the waterfront area because it would impact the parks in the district. Supports the text change in regards to waterfront manufacturing zones with a few caveats.

WHEREAS, the New York City Department of City Planning has a proposed a zoning text amendment (N 010065 ZRY) which would modify the city's sign regulations; and

WHEREAS, the proposed regulations would:

§ generally extend the regulations (size, illumination, projection, and height) applicable to C8 areas and make them applicable to all areas zoned for manufacturing,
§ limit the size of accessory signs within 200 feet of a park or arterial highway,
§ restrict the size of flashing signs on waterfront blocks and would prohibit them on all piers and platforms,
§ allow modification of sign regulations for General Large Scale Developments by special permit,
§ prohibit the replacement of nonconforming painted wall and flexible fabric signs that do not have supporting structures,
§ allow the Commissioner of Buildings to establish sign illumination standards and require any sign that exceeds the established standards to comply within one year; and

WHEREAS, such advertising signs are allowed in Manufacturing Districts, except within 200 feet of public parks or designated arterial highways, and a significant portion of the waterfront in Community Board Six, Manhattan, is zoned for manufacturing; and

WHEREAS, flexible fabric signs are attached to buildings with anchors and are subjected to physical
stress which weaken the anchors and high winds which tear the fabric signs, posing a threat to passersby; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, Community Board Six, Manhattan, supports the proposed modification (N 010065 ZRY) to the city's sign regulations, with the following caveats:

1. that advertising signs be prohibited in waterfront manufacturing zones; and
2. flexible fabric signs mounted on buildings be prohibited within New York City.

PASSED: 36 in Favor, 2 Opposed, and 0 Abstentions

Edward Rubin gave some background and an update on the potential development on the Bellevue Hospital campus. Months ago, the Economic Development Corporation issued a Request for Expressions of Interest for the disposition of the 2 1/2 acres of excess property and received six responses. At a previous meeting, EDC described NYU Medical Center's proposal. At the Committee's request, EDC returned to discuss the other proposals. The Committee also learned that the Health and Hospitals Corporation is planning to do major construction on the rest of the campus. One of the buildings, which is approximately 250,000 sq. feet., is to be an enlarged DNA laboratory for the Medical Examiner's office. The other is a 250,000 square feet outpatient facility for Bellevue Hospital replacing the garage fronting on First Avenue. The total new uses will be 600,000 square feet in the northern campus by EDC, and 500,000 square feet by Bellevue. Neither told the board nor have they indicated that they are coordinating these projects. A letter will be sent to Michael Carey, President of EDC and Dr. Luis Marcos drafted by the committee expressing concern and raise questions. Mark Adams Taylor asked who would be receiving the letter and suggested sending it to Dr. Rosa Gil at HHC. Carol Pieper also suggested the Medical Examiner's Office as well. Mr. Rubin accepted both suggestions. Mr. Rubin also discovered that day that the scoping session would be the following Thursday at Bellevue Hospital. He said that the Board would send a letter to the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York about the insufficient time of notification to community groups to have proper attendance. Mr. Rubin suggested that the Board send a letter to the state saying that this is not a fair amount of time to advertise or circulate the scoping session and to extend the scoping session.

3. PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS

Sylvia Friedman at the next meeting, EDC will be coming to discuss the proposals for the environmental center. Two proposals have been presented at a meeting that she and Steve Rosen attended. She said that she should follow up on a rumor that there was another proposal. Ms. Friedman learned from the Parks Department that a PEP worker from CB3 has been closing the parks in the district, but they are locked before 9pm. The committee will try to find an alternative. The committee is also concerned about the equipment at St. Vartan Park that still has not been replaced. It has been a high priority for years and there have been promises but nothing has changed. Jim Collins also mentioned that there was an electrical wire strung up from the park facility building on 19th Street at St. Gauden playground over to the basketball court on ad hoc basis that was a dangerous condition. He said that he spoke to a parks manager about it but nothing has been done. Carol Pieper said that she would follow up. Jack Taylor inquired about the status of the Beth Israel bridge. Ms. Friedman said that the hospital has suggested that more may be accomplished with a small committee. Committee may appoint a small group to work with Beth Israel. Martin Barrett announced that the Stuyvesant Cove Committee has folded into the Parks Committee. Ms. Friedman said that one of the first objectives is to form a not-for-profit to focus on the park. Bill Oddo asked if there has been further discussion about a memorial service at the park for Steve Rosen in the fall. Mr. Barrett said that Joy Garland would be speaking with Sally Rosen for her thoughts. Ms. Friedman said it would be best to decide on something thereafter. Peter Doukas asked about the timeline for the park. Ms. Friedman said the projected date for completion is April but not for the environmental center. Michael Hirsch asked what was going on currently. Ms. Friedman explained that pipes are being laid done by Con Ed in case they are needed for when the Waterside plant closes and the steam would go from 14th Street to midtown.

4. TRANSPORTATION

4a. Co-Naming East 25th Street—Third to Lexington Avenues—Bernard M. Baruch Way

Lou Sepersky introduced the resolution.

WHEREAS, Baruch College of The City University of New York is located within Community Board Six, Manhattan; and

WHEREAS, Baruch College is on the original 1847 site of the first municipal institution for free education in the United States, the Free Academy, and continues the mission of public education; and

WHEREAS, in 1953 the college is named in honor of Bernard M. Baruch, a world renowned philanthropist, financier, advisor to six Presidents of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the college’s academic complex on the south and north sides of East 25th Street includes classrooms, theaters, administrative facilities for the Zicklin School of Business, Weissman Arts and Sciences facility and Executive Education, the college’s Library, Conference, Financial services and Technology centers; and

WHEREAS, the college seeks to honor Bernard M. Baruch by having 25th Street, Third to Lexington Avenues, co-named in recognition of his outstanding career and contributions; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, Community Board Six, Manhattan, supports to the co-naming of East 25th Street, Third to Lexington Avenues, in honor of Bernard M. Baruch.

PASSED: 35 in Favor, 1 Opposed, 2 Abstentions, and 0 Present but not eligible to vote

4c. Traffic Safety Enforcement

Mr. Sepersky explained that the resolution calls on state legislature to lift a mandate of maximum of 50 redlight cameras for NYC. The current program has been extended to December 1, 2004. the limitation makes it difficult to put cameras in locations where they are needed. Mr. Sepersky said there is a serious problem in the district with certain intersections. Jonathan Bing asked what the catalyst was for the resolution. Lou Sepersky said there have been requests to DOT for the cameras but they have reached their maximum.

WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature and the Governor have enabled a five year extension of New York City’s “red light camera demonstration program” from December 1, 1999 to December 1, 2004 (S1533B, Chapter 503); and

WHEREAS, it has been the legislative finding and judgment that the “red light camera program” has been
found effective in reducing (by 41 percent) violations, and also accidents, at the locations of “traffic control signal photo-monitoring devices”; and

WHEREAS, in addition to their enforcement value, these units have been found to serve as a deterrent as more motorists become aware of their placement, including such a benefit to and within Community Board Six, Manhattan; and

WHEREAS, the installation of these cameras is currently limited by legislation to a maximum of 50 locations in New York City; now

THEREFORE, be it

RESOLVED, Community Board Six, Manhattan, urges the New York City Council to pass Home Rule legislation, and both houses of the State Legislature, and the Governor to sign, legislation expanding the “traffic control signal photo-monitoring” device program from its current permissible maximum of 50 to a number sufficient to enable New York City traffic enforcement agencies to effectively use “red light cameras” to actively and aggressively reduce such violations within New York City.

PASSED: 26 in Favor, 9 Opposed, 2 Abstentions, 0 Present but not eligible to vote

4d. Threatened Rerouting – M57/ loss of two bus stops

Lou Sepersky reported that Asm. John Ravitz received a reply from Lawrence Reuter, President of the MTA, saying that
a discussion on rerouting would take place in the fall but would not address the elimination of two bus stops. That is why the Committee felt that there should be a formal resolution. Peter Doukas commented that he has observed the increase of articulated buses on the M23. There was some discussion about the negative aspects of the articulated buses. Anne Emerman also brought up the dangers of 18-wheelers that turn onto side streets. Mr. Sepersky asked Ms. Emerman to call and remind him to follow up on her concerns so that it could be discussed further at the committee.

WHEREAS, the M57 route of New York City Transit's (NYCT) bus now serves stops on Sutton Place at East 55th Street and 55th Street at First Avenue, within Community Board 6, Manhattan; and

WHEREAS, NYCT is proposing elimination of these M57 stops by having the buses turn west from York Avenue/Sutton Place directly to East 57th Street, reducing the availability of bus service to residents south of 55th Street and East of First Avenue; and

WHEREAS, Lawrence G. Reuter, President of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority asserts, with the bus stop at 57th Street and First Avenue, “no customer would have to walk further than two blocks to reach the M57 bus route”; and

WHEREAS, President Reuter said the M57 issue was open to discussion, except as to "suggestions that we operate an inefficient double loop serving both (the layover at) 60th Street and (customer catchment area served by) East 55th Street"; and

WHEREAS, President Reuter asserts that maintenance of the 55th bus stops “are not realistic due to the cost and inconvenience to our customers,” in the face of NYCT current ridership data for the M57 Eastern Terminal Check Point which shows a growth from 359 riders in March to May 374 riders; now

Therefore be it

RESOLVED, Community Board 6, Manhattan, affirms its Resolution of July, 2000, and demands the retention of New York City Transit’s (NYCT) M57 bus service at Sutton Place at East 55th Street and East 55th Street at First Avenue, as the reflection of the needs of residents south of 55th Street and east of First Avenue would have to walk two additional (uphill) blocks; and

BE IT FURTHER

RESOLVED, that Community Board Six demands NYCT halt its threatened unilateral implementation of the elimination of this service in late Fall, 2000; and

BE IT FURTHER

RESOLVED, that no change in the M57 be put in place until such time as Community Board Six, and other representatives of the affected communities, can be fully and consistently involved in a decision making process that is open, participatory, and without arbitrary preconditions or dictated limitations.

PASSED: 35 in Favor, 1 Opposed, 0 Abstentions, 0 Present but not eligible to vote

5. YOUTH AND EDUCATION

Maxine McIntosh reported that she has spoken with Council Member López’s office regarding a possible Beacon School for the district. She will be scheduling similar meetings with other officials in October. In addition to appealing to politicians, staff would need to be supportive as well. It is a slow process. Subcommittee has been formed, volunteers welcome. Ms. McIntosh explained that Beacon Schools provide youth services into the evenings, and on the weekends. It is required to be housed in a middle school. The ideal location in the district would be IS104, between 20th and 21st Streets and 1st and 2nd Avenues. Mr. Barrett added that beacons also provide a broad range of services for families as well and such programs are costly. Alfred Milton asked if the school already has afterschool programs and if they would be receptive to additional programs. Ms. McIntosh said that it would not disrupt their operations; it would likely enhance their afterschool programs--these are the considerations. She also reported that there is a vacancy on School Board 2 and there is a 60-day window to appoint a replacement. She also announced that the committee would have speakers to discuss school safety, the Memorandum of Understanding with the NYPD, and the issue of truancy. Representatives from school safety at the 13th Pct and the Dept. of School Safety will attend. Council Member López has arranged for a meeting with the Board of Ed to discuss who is on the oversight committee and what have they done.

6. HUMAN SERVICES

Deborah Kaplan reported that there was a large turnout at the last Committee meeting where two representatives from Grand Central Neighborhood Social Services were on hand. The Chair of their Board spoke briefly, while Jeff Grunberg, the Executive Director, gave a brief presentation and answered questions committee prepared and then took questions from audience members. Ms. Kaplan explained that, on behalf of the Committee, she sent a follow-up letter to Mr. Grunberg with a series of questions. She received a note from Mr. Grunberg letting her know they were still compiling information. She also said that she welcomed additional concerns such as Mickey Egeth had raised regarding transportation issues that would need to be considered if a drop-in center were to be at that location. Ellen Imbimbo said that GCNSS does not have the money and asked how would the community board get involved in the public process. She said the proposal could theoretically bypass the Board, because it is a legal contract between two private entities. Ms. Imbimbo asked Edward Rubin if he could shed some light. Mr. Rubin said that it would be for public relations purposes. The partnership has a history of reaching out to the board, and CB6 is represented on their board. Ms. Imbimbo asked if there is no ULURP. Ms. Kaplan said that that was correct and that is a concern. Someone asked about the funding. Martin Barrett said that GCNSS's primary funding source is DHS with contributions from corporations in the area. Their budget is $3 million and change. GCNSS has not gotten any funding for a mortgage. Someone asked if the board has some oversight ability since GCNSS receives substantial city funding. Ms. Kaplan said the contract would not come before the board. However, the approval process is lengthy and thorough. Sylvia Friedman advised everyone to be careful when dealing with GCNSS. Clara Reiss said that they used to give her the run-around all the time when she contacted them. Ms. Kaplan announced that there would be a presentation by the Wound Care department of NYU Medical Center at the next meeting on September 20th and a discussion on MCI rent increases.

7. PUBLIC SAFETY

Mr. Barrett announced that there would be no report that evening.

Second Roll Call

Carol Schachter read the roll call.

Adjournment

There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.